A third blind test of crystal structure prediction

被引:382
作者
Day, GM
Motherwell, WDS
Ammon, HL
Boerrigter, SXM
Della Valle, RG
Venuti, E
Dzyabchenko, A
Dunitz, JD
Schweizer, B
van Eijck, BP
Erk, P
Facelli, JC
Bazterra, VE
Ferraro, MB
Hofmann, DWM
Leusen, FJJ
Liang, C
Pantelides, CC
Karamertzanis, PG
Price, SL
Lewis, TC
Nowell, H
Torrisi, A
Scheraga, HA
Arnautova, YA
Schmidt, MU
Verwer, P
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Chem Lab, Pfizer Inst Pharmaceut Mat Sci, Cambridge CB2 1EW, England
[2] Cambridge Crystallog Data Ctr, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, England
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Chem & Biochem, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Sch Pharm & Pharmacal Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[5] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Chim Fis & Inorgan, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[6] Univ Bologna, INSTM, UdR, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[7] Karpov Inst Phys Chem, Moscow 103064, Russia
[8] ETH, Organ Chem Lab, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Univ Utrecht, Dept Crystal & Struct Chem, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[10] BASF AG, Performance Chem Res, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
[11] Univ Utah, Ctr High Performance Comp, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[12] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Inorgan & Analyt Chem, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany
[13] Univ Bradford, Inst Pharmaceut Innovat, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[14] Accelrys Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[15] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci & Technol, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Chem Technol, London SW7 2AZ, England
[16] UCL, Dept Chem, London WC1H 0AJ, England
[17] UCL Royal Inst Great Britain, London W1X 4BS, England
[18] Cornell Univ, Baker Lab Chem & Chem Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[19] Univ Nijmegen, Solid State Chem Grp, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[20] Univ Nijmegen, CMBI, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION B-STRUCTURAL SCIENCE CRYSTAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS | 2005年 / 61卷
关键词
D O I
10.1107/S0108768105016563
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z' = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 527
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
*ACC INC, 2004, MS MOD REL 3 0 1
[2]  
*ACC INC, 1997, CERIUS2
[3]   TABLES OF BOND LENGTHS DETERMINED BY X-RAY AND NEUTRON-DIFFRACTION .1. BOND LENGTHS IN ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
ALLEN, FH ;
KENNARD, O ;
WATSON, DG ;
BRAMMER, L ;
ORPEN, AG ;
TAYLOR, R .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-PERKIN TRANSACTIONS 2, 1987, (12) :S1-S19
[4]   A study of the known and hypothetical crystal structures of pyridine: why are there four molecules in the asymmetric unit cell? [J].
Anghel, AT ;
Day, GM ;
Price, SL .
CRYSTENGCOMM, 2002, 4 :348-355
[5]   Derivation of a new force field for crystal-structure prediction using global optimization: Nonbonded potential parameters for hydrocarbons and alcohols [J].
Arnautova, YA ;
Jagielska, A ;
Pillardy, J ;
Scheraga, HA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (29) :7143-7154
[6]   Global optimization-based method for deriving intermolecular potential parameters for crystals [J].
Arnautova, YA ;
Pillardy, J ;
Czaplewski, C ;
Scheraga, HA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (03) :712-723
[7]   Modified genetic algorithms to model cluster structures in medium-size silicon clusters -: art. no. 053202 [J].
Bazterra, VE ;
Oña, O ;
Caputo, MC ;
Ferraro, MB ;
Fuentealba, P ;
Facelli, JC .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2004, 69 (05) :053202-1
[8]   Modified genetic algorithm to model crystal structures: III. Determination of crystal structures allowing simultaneous molecular geometry relaxation [J].
Bazterra, VE ;
Ferraro, MB ;
Facelli, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2004, 96 (04) :312-320
[9]   Modified genetic algorithm to model crystal structures. II. Determination of a polymorphic structure of benzene using enthalpy minimization [J].
Bazterra, VE ;
Ferraro, MB ;
Facelli, JC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 116 (14) :5992-5995
[10]   Modified genetic algorithm to model crystal structures. I. Benzene, naphthalene and anthracene [J].
Bazterra, VE ;
Ferraro, MB ;
Facelli, JC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 116 (14) :5984-5991