Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial

被引:869
作者
Greenwood, John P. [1 ,2 ]
Maredia, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Younger, John F. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Julia M. [3 ]
Nixon, Jane [3 ]
Everett, Colin C. [3 ]
Bijsterveld, Petra [1 ,2 ]
Ridgway, John P. [4 ]
Radjenovic, Aleksandra [1 ,2 ]
Dickinson, Catherine J. [5 ]
Ball, Stephen G. [1 ,2 ]
Plein, Sven [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Multidisciplinary Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Genet Hlth & Therapeut, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Med Phys, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Nucl Cardiol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
ARTERY-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-PERFUSION; MULTICENTER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; COMMITTEE; ISCHEMIA; RESERVE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multi parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. Methods In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used Tc-99m tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133. Findings In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86.5% (95% CI 81.8-90.1), specificity 83.4% (79.5-86.7), positive predictive value 77.2%, (72.1-81.6) and negative predictive value 90.5% (87.1-93.0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66.5% (95% CI 60.4-72.1), specificity 82.6% (78.5-86.1), positive predictive value 71.4% (65.3-76.9), and negative predictive value 79.1% (74.8-82.8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0.0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0.916 and p=0.061, respectively). Interpretation CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 460
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]
Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Al-Saadi, N ;
Nagel, E ;
Gross, M ;
Bornstedt, A ;
Schnackenburg, B ;
Klein, C ;
Klimek, W ;
Oswald, H ;
Fleck, E .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (12) :1379-1383
[3]
[Anonymous], 2009, J NUCL CARDIOL
[4]
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association [J].
Cerqueira, MD ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Dilsizian, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kaul, S ;
Laskey, WK ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Rumberger, JA ;
Ryan, T ;
Verani, MS .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (04) :539-542
[5]
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care - The Framingham Heart Study [J].
D'Agostino, Ralph B. ;
Vasan, Ramachandran S. ;
Pencina, Michael J. ;
Wolf, Philip A. ;
Cobain, Mark ;
Massaro, Joseph M. ;
Kannel, William B. .
CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (06) :743-753
[6]
Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses:: first European multi-centre experience [J].
Giang, TH ;
Nanz, D ;
Coulden, R ;
Friedrich, M ;
Graves, M ;
Al-Saadi, N ;
Lüscher, TF ;
von Schulthess, GK ;
Schwitter, J .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (18) :1657-1665
[7]
Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction [J].
Greenwood, J. P. ;
Younger, J. F. ;
Ridgway, J. P. ;
Sivananthan, M. U. ;
Ball, S. G. ;
Plein, S. .
HEART, 2007, 93 (11) :1363-1368
[8]
Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: The CE-MARC study [J].
Greenwood, John P. ;
Maredia, Neil ;
Radjenovic, Aleksandra ;
Brown, Julia M. ;
Nixon, Jane ;
Farrin, Amanda J. ;
Dickinson, Catherine ;
Younger, John F. ;
Ridgway, John P. ;
Sculpher, Mark ;
Ball, Stephen G. ;
Plein, Sven .
TRIALS, 2009, 10
[9]
Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease [J].
Hamon, Michele ;
Fau, Georges ;
Nee, Guillaume ;
Ehtisham, Javed ;
Morello, Remy ;
Hamon, Martial .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2010, 12
[10]
Hendel RC, 2006, J NUCL CARDIOL, V13, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.013