Performance of severity of illness scoring systems in emergency department patients with infection

被引:90
作者
Howell, Michael D. [1 ]
Donnino, Michael W.
Talmor, Daniel
Clardy, Peter
Ngo, Long
Shapiro, Nathan I.
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Dept Med, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
sepsis; severity of illness; septic shock; risk stratification;
D O I
10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.036
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To validate the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, the Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) score, and a modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) in patients with suspected infection. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Adult patients with clinically suspected infection admitted from December 10, 2003, to September 30, 2004, in an urban emergency department with approximately 50,000 annual visits were eligible. The MEDS and CURB-65 scores were calculated as originally described, but REMS was modified in neurologic scoring because a full Glasgow Coma Scale score was not uniformly available. Discrimination of each score was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: Of 2,132 patients, 3.9% (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 3.1% to 4.7%) died. Mortality stratified by the MEDS score was as follows: 0-4 points, 0.4% (95% Cl = 0.0 to 0.7%); 5-7 points, 3.3% (95% Cl = 1.7% to 4.9%); 8-12 points, 6.6% (95% Cl = 4.4% to 8.8%); and >= 13 points, 31.6% (95% Cl = 22.4% to 40.8%). Mortality stratified by CURB-65 was as follows: 0 points, 0% (0 of 457 patients); 1 point, 1.6% (95% Cl = 0.6% to 2.6%); 2 points, 4.1% (95% Cl = 2.3% to 6.0%); 3 points, 4.9% (95% Cl = 2.8% to 6.9%); 4 points, 18.1% (95% Cl = 11.9% to 24.3%); and 5 points, 28.0% (95% Cl = 10.4% to 45.6%). Mortality stratified by the mREMS was as follows: 0-2 points, 0.6% (95% Cl = 0 to 1.2%); 3-5 points, 2.0% (95% Cl = 0.8% to 3.1%); 6-8 points, 2.3% (95% Cl = 1.1% to 3.5%); 9-11 points, 7.1% (95% Cl = 4.2% to 10.1%); 12-14 points, 20.0% (95% Cl = 12.5% to 27.5%); and >= 15 points, 40.0% (95% Cl = 22.5% to 57.5%). The AUCs were 0.85, 0.80, and 0.79 for MEDS, mREMS, and CURB-65, respectively. Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with clinically suspected infection, MEDS, mREMS, and CURB-65 all correlated well with 28-day in-hospital mortality. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2007; 14:709-714 (c) 2007 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 714
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death [J].
Abraham, E ;
Laterre, P ;
Garg, R ;
Levy, H ;
Talwar, D ;
Trzaskoma, BL ;
Francois, B ;
Guy, JS ;
Bruckmann, M ;
Rea-Neto, A ;
Rossaint, R ;
Perrotin, D ;
Sablotzki, A ;
Arkins, N ;
Utterback, BG ;
Macias, WL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (13) :1332-1341
[2]   Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J].
Angus, DC ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Lidicker, J ;
Clermont, G ;
Carcillo, J ;
Pinsky, MR .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) :1303-1310
[3]   Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. [J].
Bernard, GR ;
Vincent, JL ;
Laterre, P ;
LaRosa, SP ;
Dhainaut, JF ;
Lopez-Rodriguez, A ;
Steingrub, JS ;
Garber, GE ;
Helterbrand, JD ;
Ely, EW ;
Fisher, CJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (10) :699-709
[4]   Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Capelastegul, A ;
España, PP ;
Quintana, JM ;
Areltio, I ;
Gorordo, I ;
Egurrola, M ;
Bilbao, A .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (01) :151-157
[5]   Risk stratification of severe sepsis patients in the emergency department [J].
Chen, CC ;
Chong, CF ;
Liu, YL ;
Chen, KC ;
Wang, TL .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (04) :281-285
[6]   Risk and the efficacy of antiinflammatory agents - Retrospective and confirmatory studies of sepsis [J].
Eichacker, PQ ;
Parent, C ;
Kalil, A ;
Esposito, C ;
Cui, X ;
Banks, SM ;
Gerstenberger, EP ;
Fitz, Y ;
Danner, RL ;
Natanson, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (09) :1197-1205
[7]   Prediction of mortality among emergency medical admissions [J].
Goodacre, S ;
Turner, J ;
Nicholl, J .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (05) :372-375
[8]   Bench-to-bedside review: Outcome predictions for critically ill patients in the emergency department [J].
Hargrove, J ;
Nguyen, HB .
CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (04) :376-383
[9]  
HOWELL M, IN PRESS INTENSIVE C
[10]   Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study [J].
Lim, WS ;
van der Eerden, MM ;
Laing, R ;
Boersma, WG ;
Karalus, N ;
Town, GI ;
Lewis, SA ;
Macfarlane, JT .
THORAX, 2003, 58 (05) :377-382