Desensitization of the perception system for chitin fragments in tomato cells

被引:51
作者
Felix, G [1 ]
Baureithel, K [1 ]
Boller, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Miescher Inst, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.117.2.643
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Suspension-cultured tomato (Lycopersicon escolentum) cells react to stimulation by chitin fragments with a rapid, transient alkalinization of the growth medium, but behave refractory to a second treatment with the same stimulus (C. Felix, M. Regenass, T. Boiler [1993] Plant J 4: 307-316). We analyzed this phenomenon and found that chitin fragments caused desensitization in a time-and concentration-dependent manner. Partially desensitized cells exhibited a clear shift toward lower sensitivity of the perception system. The ability of chitin oligomers to induce desensitization depended on the degree of polymerization (DP), with DP5 approximate to DP4 much greater than DP3 much greater than DP2 > DP1. This correlates with the ability of these oligomers to induce the alkalinization response and to compete for the high-affinity binding site on tomato cells and microsomal membranes, indicating that the alkalinization response and the desensitization process are mediated by the same receptor. The dose required for half-maximal desensitization was about 20 times lower than the dose required for half-maximal alkalinization; desensitization could therefore be used as a highly sensitive bioassay for chitin fragments and chitin-related stimuli such as lipochitooligosaccharides (nodulation factors) from Rhizobium leguminosarum. Desensitization was not associated with increased inactivation of the stimulus or with a disappearance of high-affinity binding sites from the cell surface, and thus appears to be caused by an intermediate step in signal transduction.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 650
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES IN BACTERIA
    ARMITAGE, JP
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 54 : 683 - 714
  • [2] BASSE CW, 1992, J BIOL CHEM, V267, P10258
  • [3] BASSE CW, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P14724
  • [4] BAUREITHEL K, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P17931
  • [5] CHEMOPERCEPTION OF MICROBIAL SIGNALS IN PLANT-CELLS
    BOLLER, T
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 46 : 189 - 214
  • [6] CHARACTERIZATION OF BINDING-PROTEINS THAT RECOGNIZE OLIGOGLUCOSIDE ELICITORS OF PHYTOALEXIN SYNTHESIS IN SOYBEAN
    COTE, F
    CHEONG, JJ
    ALBA, R
    HAHN, MG
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1995, 93 (02) : 401 - 410
  • [7] PHYTOALEXINS AND THEIR ELICITORS - A DEFENSE AGAINST MICROBIAL INFECTION IN PLANTS
    DARVILL, AG
    ALBERSHEIM, P
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1984, 35 : 243 - 275
  • [8] DENARIE J, 1992, ANNU REV MICROBIOL, V46, P494
  • [9] DUSENBERY DB, 1992, SENSORY ECOLOGY ORG
  • [10] EBEL J, 1994, INT REV CYTOL, V148, P1