Strategies for retaining study participants in behavioral intervention trials: Retention experiences of the NIH behavior change consortium

被引:89
作者
Coday, M
Boutin-Foster, C
Sher, TG
Tennant, J
Greaney, ML
Saunders, SD
Somes, GW
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Prevent Med, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] IIT, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Rhode Isl, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Failing to retain an adequate number of study participants in behavioral intervention trials poses a threat to interpretation of study results and its external validity. This qualitative investigation describes the retention strategies promoted by the recruitment and retention committee of the Behavior Change Consortium, a group of 15 university-based sites funded by the National Institutes of Health to implement studies targeted toward disease prevention through behavior change. During biannual meetings, focus groups were conducted with all sites to determine barriers encountered in retaining study participants and strategies employed to address these barriers. All of the retention strategies reported were combined into 8 thematic retention categories. Those categories perceived to be most effective for retaining studs; participants were summarized and consistencies noted among site populations across the life course (e.g., older adults. adults, children, and adolescents). Further possible discrepancies between site populations of varying health statuses are discussed, and an ecological framework is proposed for use in future investigations on retention.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]  
ATKINS CJ, 1987, AM J PREV MED, V3, P87
[3]   GENERALIZING THE RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BAILEY, KR .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (01) :15-23
[4]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[5]  
BANDURA A, 1986, SOC FDN THOUGHT ACYT
[6]  
*BCC RECR RET WORK, MISS STAT
[7]   Recruiting patients to randomized trials in primary care: principles and case study [J].
Bell-Syer, SEM ;
Moffett, JAK .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (02) :187-191
[8]   Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: Evaluating barriers to recruitment [J].
Boles, M ;
Getchell, WS ;
Feldman, G ;
McBride, R ;
Hart, RG .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (04) :279-292
[9]   Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials [J].
Brown, DR ;
Fouad, MN ;
Basen-Engquist, K ;
Tortolero-Luna, G .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (08) :S13-S21
[10]   Overcoming subject recruitment challenges: Strategies for successful collaboration with novice research agencies [J].
Butterfield, PG ;
Yates, SM ;
Rogers, B ;
Healow, JM .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 16 (01) :46-52