The rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by NF and RO membranes as a function of compound a water matrix properties

被引:180
作者
Comerton, Anna M. [1 ]
Andrews, Robert C. [1 ]
Bagley, David M. [2 ]
Hao, Chunyan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Ontario Minist Environm, Lab Serv Branch, Appl Chromatog Sect, Manchester M9P 3V6, Lancs, England
关键词
endocrine disrupting compounds; pharmaceutically active compounds; nanofiltration; reverse osmosis; fouling;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.021
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study examined the rejection of 22 endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceutically active compounds (PhAC) from raw and 5-mu m filtered Lake Ontario water, membrane bioreactor effluent and laboratory-grade water (Milli-Q (R)) by 'loose' and 'tight' nanofiltration (NF) membranes and a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane. Rejection by the 'tight' NF membrane was most strongly correlated with compound log K-ow and water solubility with the more hydrophobic compounds showing higher rejection. The RO membrane provided efficient EDC and PhAC removal (>90%). Conversely, in general, the 'loose' NF membrane offered poor and variable compound removal. Fouling and the presence of organic matter likely contributed to higher rejections of EDCs and PhACs while higher concentrations of divalent ions appeared to result in lower EDC and PhAC rejection by the membranes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 335
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Change in membrane performance due to organic fouling in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) applications [J].
Agenson, Kenneth O. ;
Urase, Taro .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 55 (02) :147-156
[2]   ISOLATION OF HYDROPHILIC ORGANIC-ACIDS FROM WATER USING NONIONIC MACROPOROUS RESINS [J].
AIKEN, GR ;
MCKNIGHT, DM ;
THORN, KA ;
THURMAN, EM .
ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 18 (04) :567-573
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V16th, DOI DOI 10.1-10.47
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DESIGN ANAL EXPT
[5]  
AWWA, 1999, REV OSM NAN MAN WAT
[6]  
BURBANO AA, 2007, AWWA, V99, P116
[7]   EDGE PROFILES AND DYNAMIC CONTACT ANGLES OF A SPREADING DROP [J].
CHEN, JD ;
WADA, N .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1992, 148 (01) :207-222
[8]   Influences of molecular weight, molecular size, flux, and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membranes [J].
Chen, SS ;
Taylor, JS ;
Mulford, LA ;
Norris, CD .
DESALINATION, 2004, 160 (02) :103-111
[9]   Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 119 (02) :253-268
[10]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane [J].
Cho, J ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 164 (1-2) :89-110