Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control - A cross-societal study

被引:123
作者
Hayashi, N [1 ]
Ostrom, E
Walker, J
Yamagishi, T
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Humanities & Sociol, Dept Social Pyschol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Workshop Polit Theory & Policy Anal, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Econ, Wrokshop Polit Theory & Policy Anal, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Letters, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060, Japan
关键词
trust; reciprocity; experimental; Prisoner's Dilemma;
D O I
10.1177/104346399011001002
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Most cognitive approaches for explaining cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma games include the view that many people believe that mutual cooperation is generally a gainful strategy to all parties and will cooperate when they think their partner cooperates. Proceeding along these lines, we argue that many participants treat a Prisoner's Dilemma game as an assurance game, and respond in a reciprocal manner to the choice or expected choice of their partner. We examine two bases for the expectation of a partner's cooperation in one-shot games: 'general trust' and a 'sense of control'. Further, we discuss why we expect general trust and a sense of control to play different roles in societies, particularly in Japanese society and American society. Specifically, we test a general hypothesis that a sense of control plays a relatively more important role as a foundation for expectations in Japanese society and general trust plays the more important role in American society.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 46
页数:20
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ANDREONI J, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P891
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, JAPANESE J EXPT SOCI, DOI DOI 10.2130/JJESP.32.231
[5]  
BEARD TR, 1997, CULTURAL DETERMINANT
[6]  
Benedict R., 1946, The chrysanthemum and the sword
[7]  
patterns of Japanese culture
[8]   SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION AND SIMILARITY IN INTERGROUP BEHAVIOUR [J].
BILLIG, M ;
TAJFEL, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01) :27-52
[9]  
Carnevale P., 1995, NEGOTIATION SOCIAL P, P309
[10]  
CHAN D, 1994, COMP NEGOTIATION CUL