Phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitoxantrone in patients with persistent ovarian cancer

被引:15
作者
Husain, A
Sabbatini, P
Spriggs, D
Fennelly, D
Aghajanian, C
Barakat, R
Curtin, J
Venkatraman, E
Hoskins, W
Markman, M
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Dev Chemotherapy Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Dublin 4, Ireland
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1998.5317
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitoxantrone in patients with very small-volume residual disease at second-look surgery after completion of primary platinum-based intravenous chemotherapy, Patients and methods, Between February 1992 and February 1994, 42 patients were treated with up to five cycles of intraperitoneal cisplatin (100 mg/m(2))/mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2)). Patients were evaluated for surgically defined response rate and followed for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using an intention-to-treat analysis, and grouped according to disease volume at initiation of treatment. Results. The mean age of all patients was 48.5 years. Thirty patients (71%) were Stage III at diagnosis; 18 patients (43%) had microscopic disease at the initiation of IP therapy, and 24 patients (57%) had macroscopic disease. Twenty-eight patients completed three or more cycles of protocol therapy, and 14 patients were changed to standard intravenous therapy after receiving fewer than three cycles of treatment secondary to catheter-related problems (12 patients), cisplatin ototoxicity (1 patient), or withdrawal from study (1 patient). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, the median PFS was 22.5 months, and the median OS of all patients (N = 42) was 47 months (6-72 months) with a median follow-up of 62.7 months. When grouped according to size of disease at initiation of treatment, the OS has not been reached at 62.7 months of follow-up in patients (N = 18) with microscopic disease. Conclusions. (1) The combination of LP mitoxantrone and cisplatin has an unacceptable catheter failure rate due to mitoxantrone toxicity; (2) PFS and OS is longer in patients with microscopic rather than macroscopic residual disease; and (3) intraperitoneal platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with very small-volume residual disease may result in improved survival, (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ALBERTS DS, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P38
[2]  
ALBERTS DS, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V335, P1801
[3]   A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Almadrones, L ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Brown, C ;
Shapiro, F ;
Curtin, JP ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :17-22
[4]   INTRAPERITONEAL ADMINISTRATION OF CISPLATIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN RESIDUAL OVARIAN-CANCER - A PHASE-II GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP TRIAL [J].
BRALY, PS ;
BEREK, JS ;
BLESSING, JA ;
HOMESLEY, HD ;
AVERETTE, H .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 56 (02) :164-168
[5]  
COPELAND LJ, 1985, CANCER, V55, P472, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850115)55:2<472::AID-CNCR2820550231>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-A
[7]   Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: Tissue penetration and surface exposure [J].
Dedrick, RL ;
Flessner, MF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (07) :480-487
[8]   PHASE-I FEASIBILITY AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDY OF WEEKLY INTRAPERITONEAL PACLITAXEL - A GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP PILOT-STUDY [J].
FRANCIS, P ;
ROWINSKY, E ;
SCHNEIDER, J ;
HAKES, T ;
HOSKINS, W ;
MARKMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (12) :2961-2967
[9]   PHASE-II TRIAL OF WEEKLY OR BIWEEKLY INTRAPERITONEAL MITOXANTRONE IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
MARKMAN, M ;
HAKES, T ;
REICHMAN, B ;
LEWIS, JL ;
RUBIN, S ;
JONES, W ;
ALMADRONES, L ;
HOSKINS, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (06) :978-982
[10]  
MARKMAN M, 1991, SEMIN ONCOL, V18, P248