A multiagent approach to managing air traffic flow

被引:72
作者
Agogino, Adrian K. [2 ]
Tumer, Kagan [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Air traffic control; Multiagent learning; Agent coordination; CONFLICT-RESOLUTION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10458-010-9142-5
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Intelligent air traffic flow management is one of the fundamental challenges facing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today. FAA estimates put weather, routing decisions and airport condition induced delays at 1,682,700 h in 2007 (FAA OPSNET Data, US Department of Transportation website, http://www.faa.gov/data_statistics/), resulting in a staggering economic loss of over $41 billion (Joint Economic Commission Majority Staff, Your flight has been delayed again, 2008). New solutions to the flow management are needed to accommodate the threefold increase in air traffic anticipated over the next two decades. Indeed, this is a complex problem where the interactions of changing conditions (e.g., weather), conflicting priorities (e.g., different airlines), limited resources (e.g., air traffic controllers) and heavy volume (e.g., over 40,000 flights over the US airspace) demand an adaptive and robust solution. In this paper we explore a multiagent algorithm where agents use reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce congestion through local actions. Each agent is associated with a fix (a specific location in 2D space) and has one of three actions: setting separation between airplanes, ordering ground delays or performing reroutes. We simulate air traffic using FACET which is an air traffic flow simulator developed at NASA and used extensively by the FAA and industry. Our FACET simulations on both artificial and real historical data from the Chicago and New York airspaces show that agents receiving personalized rewards reduce congestion by up to 80% over agents receiving a global reward and by up to 90% over a current industry approach (Monte Carlo estimation).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Agogino A, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3102, P1
[2]  
AGOGINO A, 2005, P 4 INT JOINT C AUT
[3]   LEARNING INDIRECT ACTIONS IN COMPLEX DOMAINS: ACTION SUGGESTIONS FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL [J].
Agogino, Adrian ;
Tumer, Kagan .
ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2009, 12 (4-5) :493-512
[4]   Handling communication restrictions and team formation in congestion games [J].
Agogino, AK ;
Tumer, K .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 13 (01) :97-115
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FAA OPSNET DAT JAN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, P 7 INT JOINT C AUT
[7]  
[Anonymous], TERMINAL CHAOS WHY U
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, AIAA GUIDANCE NAVIGA, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2000-4265
[9]   Lagrangian delay predictive model for sector-based air traffic flow [J].
Bayen, AM ;
Meyer, G ;
Tomlin, CJ .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2005, 28 (05) :1015-1026
[10]   The air traffic flow management problem with enroute capacities [J].
Bertsimas, D ;
Patterson, SS .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1998, 46 (03) :406-422