Hormone replacement therapy and high S phase in breast cancer

被引:34
作者
Cobleigh, MA
Norlock, FE
Oleske, DM
Starr, A
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Sect Med Oncol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 281卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.281.16.1528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Prolonged postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer and, paradoxically, reduced breast cancer mortality, The biological rationale for this discrepancy has not been explored. Objective To compare the prognostic characteristics of cancers arising in women who have used HRT with those in women who never have used HRT. Design Prospective cohort study from December 1989 to November 1996. Setting Teaching hospital in a large midwestern metropolitan area. Patients Cohort of 331 postmenopausal women who presented consecutively with 349 invasive breast cancers. Main outcome Measures Estrogen receptor (ER) status (ER positive vs ER negative) and S phase (low vs high) for current HRT users vs never users. Results The frequency of high S-phase fraction among cancers in women who were using HRT was markedly increased com pared with that in women who had never used HRT (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-7.66). However, the greater frequency of high S-phase fraction was limited to women with ER-positive cancers (for HRT users vs never Users, OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.36-20.28; for ER-negative cancers in HRT users vs never users, OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.20-5.86). Conclusions Use of HRT appears to stimulate growth of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer as measured by S-phase fraction. The prognostic significance of high S-phase fraction in current HRT users who have ER-positive tumors is unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1530
页数:3
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] BALSLEV I, 1994, INT J CANCER, V56, P16
  • [2] Beral V, 1997, LANCET, V350, P1047, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08233-0
  • [3] CLINICAL AND BIOLOGIC PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER DIAGNOSED DURING POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY
    BONNIER, P
    ROMAIN, S
    GIACALONE, PL
    LAFFARGUE, F
    MARTIN, PM
    PIANA, L
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [4] BOSARI S, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V70, P1943, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19921001)70:7<1943::AID-CNCR2820700722>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-Y
  • [6] PREDICTION OF RELAPSE OR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER BY DNA FLOW-CYTOMETRY
    CLARK, GM
    DRESSLER, LG
    OWENS, MA
    POUNDS, G
    OLDAKER, T
    MCGUIRE, WL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (10) : 627 - 633
  • [7] COBLEIGH MA, 1998, CANC TREAT RES, V94, P210
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    COLDITZ, GA
    STAMPFER, MJ
    WILLETT, WC
    HENNEKENS, CH
    ROSNER, B
    SPEIZER, FE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (20): : 2648 - 2653
  • [9] RISK-FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER BY ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS - A POPULATION-BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    COOPER, JA
    ROHAN, TE
    CANT, ELM
    HORSFALL, DJ
    TILLEY, WD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [10] DHODAPKAR MV, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P43, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<43::AID-CNCR2820750109>3.0.CO