The Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS): a new measurement tool for audit and research

被引:215
作者
Horne, R [1 ]
Hankins, M [1 ]
Jenkins, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brighton, Ctr Hlth Care Res, Brighton BN1 9PH, E Sussex, England
来源
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE | 2001年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
patients' views; medicines information; questionnaires; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1136/qhc.0100135
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective-To develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS), a new 17-item tool designed to assess the extent to which patients feel they have received enough information about prescribed medicines. Methods-Patients from eight diagnostic categories were recruited at hospitals in London and Brighton and completed the SIMS questionnaire during hospital admission or attendance at outpatient clinic appointments. The SIMS was evaluated in terms of its ease of use, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion related validity using existing self-report measures of adherence and patient beliefs about medicines. Results-The SIMS was well accepted by patients in a variety of clinical settings and showed satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability. As predicted, higher levels of satisfaction with medicines information were associated with higher levels of reported adherence, and lower levels of satisfaction were associated with stronger concerns about the potential adverse effects of medicines, providing evidence of criterion related validity. Conclusion-The SIMS performed well on a number of psychometric indicators and shows promise as a tool for audit (measuring patients' satisfaction with information about their prescribed medicines), research (evaluating current or new forms of information provision), and clinical practice (identifying the information needs of individual patients and as an aid to planning medicine related consultations).
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 140
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ALI A, 1996, PHARM PRACTICE, V5, P333
[2]  
Association of the British Pharmacy Industry, 1988, PAT INF ADV DRAFT LE
[3]   EVALUATION OF DRUG INFORMATION FOR CARDIOLOGY PATIENTS [J].
BAKER, D ;
ROBERTS, DE ;
NEWCOMBE, RG ;
FOX, KAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 31 (05) :525-531
[4]  
CROMBIE IK, 1993, AUDIT HDB IMPROVING
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, NHS PLAN PLAN INV PL
[6]   ADVERSE DRUG EFFECTS AND THE NEED FOR DRUG INFORMATION [J].
ENLUND, H ;
VAINIO, K ;
WALLENIUS, S ;
POSTON, JW .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (06) :558-564
[7]   THE BENEFITS OF PRESCRIPTION INFORMATION LEAFLETS .1. [J].
GIBBS, S ;
WATERS, WE ;
GEORGE, CF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 27 (06) :723-739
[8]   Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness [J].
Horne, R ;
Weinman, J .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1999, 47 (06) :555-567
[9]  
HORNE R, 1999, AUDIT ASTHMA DIABETI
[10]  
HORNE R, 1996, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V14, P1