Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?

被引:316
作者
Hanushek, EA
Raymond, ME
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Execut Board, Texas Sch Project, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pam.20091
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The leading school reform policy in the United States revolves around strong accountability of schools with consequences for performance. The federal government involvement through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 reinforces the prior movement of many states toward policies based on measured student achievement. Analysis of state achievement growth as measured by the National Assessment of Educational progress shows that accountability systems introduced during the 1990s had a clear positive impact on student achievement. This single policy instrument did not, however, also lead to any narrowing in the Black-White achievement gap (though it did narrow the Hispanic-White achievement gap). Moreover, the Black-White gap appears to have been adversely impacted over the decade by increasing minority concentrations in the schools. An additional issue surrounding stronger accountability has been a concern about unintended outcomes related to such things as higher exclusion rates from testing, increased dropout rates, and the like. Our analysis of special education placement rates, a frequently identified area of concern, does not show any responsiveness to the introduction of accountability systems. (c) 2005 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 327
页数:31
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
AMREIN AL, 2002, IMPACT HIGH STAKES T
[2]  
[Anonymous], STATE STATE STANDARD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ED NEXT
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES 0820
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, PROJECTIONS ED STAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], RAC IS PUBL SCH
[7]  
Armor DavidJ., 1995, FORCED JUSTICE SCH D
[8]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[9]  
BISHOP J, 2004, CESIF HARV U PEPG C
[10]  
BISHOP JH, 2001, BROOKINGS PAPERS ED, P267