Self-reported health status of the general adult US population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index

被引:309
作者
Luo, N
Johnson, JA
Shaw, JW
Feeny, D
Coons, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon Res, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Hlth Utilities Incorp, Dundas, ON, Canada
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Inst Hlth & Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[6] QualityMetr Inc, Lincoln, RI USA
关键词
EQ-5D; HUI; health status; population health; survey;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000182493.57090.c1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to describe the self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population using 3 multi-attribute preference-based measures: the EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2), and Mark 3 (HUI3). Methods: We surveyed the general adult U.S. population using a probability sample with oversampling of Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks. Respondents to this home-visit survey self-completed the EQ-5D-and HUI2/3 questionnaires. Overall health index scores of the target population and selected subgroups were estimated and construct validity of these measures was assessed by testing a priori hypotheses. Results: Completed questionnaires were collected from 4048 respondents (response rate: 59.4%). The majority of the respondents were women (52.0%); the mean age of the sample was 45 years, with 14.8% being 65 or older. Index scores (standard errors) for the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HU13 were 0.87 (0.01), 0.86 (0.01), and 0.81 (0.01), respectively. Generally, younger, male and Hispanic or non-Hispanic black adults had higher (better) index scores than older, female and other racial/ ethnic adults; index scores were higher with higher educational attainment and household income. The 3 overall preference indices were strongly correlated (Pearson's r: 0.67-0.87), but systematically different, with intraclass correlation coefficients between these indices ranging from 0.59 to 0.77.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1086
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan general population: feasibility and construct validity [J].
Badia, X ;
Schiaffino, A ;
Alonso, J ;
Herdman, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (04) :311-322
[2]  
BELANGER A, 2000, HEAD HEAD COMP 2 GEN
[3]   Differential Item Functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36 [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kreiner, S ;
Ware, JE ;
Damsgaard, MT ;
Bech, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1189-1202
[4]   Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Hunink, MGM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (06) :591-601
[5]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[6]  
Brooks R., 2003, MEASUREMENT VALUATIO
[7]   Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D [J].
Burström, K ;
Johannesson, M ;
Diderichsen, F .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :621-635
[8]  
CLAUSER BE, 2005, USING STAT PROCEDURE
[9]  
Cohen SB, 2003, MED CARE, V41, P5
[10]   Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments [J].
Conner-Spady, B ;
Suarez-Almazor, ME .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (07) :791-801