Predictiveness of antenatal umbilical artery Doppler for adverse pregnancy outcome in small-for-gestational-age babies according to customised birthweight centiles: population-based study

被引:98
作者
Figueras, F. [1 ]
Eixarch, E. [1 ]
Gratacos, E. [1 ]
Gardosi, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Obstet, Barcelona, Spain
[2] W Midlands Perinatal Inst, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Doppler evaluation; fetal growth; fetal growth restriction; small-for-gestational-age fetus; umbilical artery;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01670.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective To examine the relationship between smallness at birth and the predictive value of umbilical artery Doppler. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary referral university hospital, Barcelona. Population A total of 7645 singleton pregnancies delivered between January 2002 and June 2004. Methods The associations with adverse outcome were assessed for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies according to customised standards who had normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Main outcome measures Neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Results Of the 369 SGA fetuses that had been identified antenatally, 70 (19%) had an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and the babies from these pregnancies had a higher risk for neonatal morbidity when compared with babies with normal birthweight (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.04-11.03). However, the remaining 299 (81%) fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler also had an elevated risk of neonatal morbidity (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.04-4.39). Overall, many of the instances of adverse outcome associated with smallness for gestational age were attributable to the group with normal Doppler than to the group with abnormal Doppler. Conclusions Normal antenatal umbilical artery Doppler cannot be taken as an indicator of low risk in pregnancies where the fetus is SGA according to customised percentiles.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 594
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
COMPARISON OF UMBILICAL-ARTERY VELOCIMETRY AND CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY FOR SURVEILLANCE OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES [J].
ALMSTROM, H ;
AXELSSON, O ;
CNATTINGIUS, S ;
EKMAN, G ;
MAESEL, A ;
ULMSTEN, U ;
ARSTROM, K ;
MARSAL, K .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8825) :936-940
[2]
NORMAL VALUES OF PULSATILITY INDEX FROM FETAL VESSELS - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON 1556 HEALTHY FETUSES [J].
ARDUINI, D ;
RIZZO, G .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (03) :165-172
[3]
Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction [J].
Barker, David J. P. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) :270-283
[4]
The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited [J].
Baschat, AA ;
Gembruch, U .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 21 (02) :124-127
[5]
Differentiation of growth retarded from normally grown fetuses and prediction of intrauterine growth retardation using Doppler ultrasound [J].
Bates, JA ;
Evans, JA ;
Mason, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :670-675
[6]
BOUROW CS, 1999, LANCET, V353, P1460
[7]
Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards [J].
Clausson, B ;
Gardosi, J ;
Francis, A ;
Cnattingius, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (08) :830-834
[8]
Coomarasamy A, 2002, INVESTIGATION MANAGE
[9]
de Jong CLD, 1998, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V105, P531
[10]
Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: A French multicenter study [J].
Ego, A ;
Subtil, D ;
Grange, G ;
Thiebaugeorges, O ;
Senat, MV ;
Vayssiere, C ;
Zeitlin, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) :1042-1049