A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour

被引:71
作者
Eddleston, JM
Holland, JJ
Griffin, RP
Corbett, A
Horsman, EL
Reynolds, F
机构
[1] ST THOMAS HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHET,LONDON SE1 7EH,ENGLAND
[2] FREEMAN RD HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,NEWCASTLE TYNE,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
[3] GUYS HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,LONDON SE1 9RT,ENGLAND
关键词
anaesthesia; obstetric; anaesthetic techniques; extradural; anaesthetics local; bupivacaine; ropivacaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/76.1.66
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Ropivacaine is a new aminoamide local anaesthetic. Compared with bupivacaine, ropivacaine possesses a higher threshold for systemic toxicity and a high selectivity for sensory fibres. We have compared prospectively these two agents in a concentration of 0.25% for extradural analgesia in labour. A total of 104 parturients requesting extradural analgesia were randomized to receive either ropivacaine or bupivacaine. The women in the bupivacaine group required more top-up doses to maintain analgesia (median 3.0 vs 2.0) (P<0.05). The onset of sensory block, quality of analgesia, ultimate level of maximum sensory block and maternal satisfaction were similar in both groups. The incidence, intensity and duration of motor block were slightly but not significantly less in the ropivacaine group. The ropivacaine group had a higher incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (70.59% vs 52.00%). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar scores, umbilical acid-base status and neurological and adaptive capacity score at 2 and 24 h after delivery. We conclude that ropivacaine and bupivacaine in a concentration of 0.25% produced comparable analgesia for pain relief of labour with no detectable adverse effect on the neonate.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABBOUD TK, 1982, ANESTH ANALG, V61, P638
[2]  
ABBOUD TK, 1985, ANESTH ANALG, V64, P996
[3]  
ABBOUD TK, 1984, ANESTH ANALG, V63, P421
[4]   CARDIAC-ARREST FOLLOWING REGIONAL ANESTHESIA WITH ETIDOCAINE OR BUPIVACAINE [J].
ALBRIGHT, GA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1979, 51 (04) :285-287
[5]   COMPARISON OF 0.5-PERCENT ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE FOR EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER-EXTREMITY SURGERY [J].
BROWN, DL ;
CARPENTER, RL ;
THOMPSON, GE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (04) :633-636
[6]   COMPARISON OF THE MATERNAL AND FETAL EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTERMITTENT OR CONTINUOUS INFUSION OF EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA [J].
EDDLESTON, JM ;
MARESH, M ;
HORSMAN, EL ;
YOUNG, H ;
LACEY, P ;
ANDERTON, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (02) :154-158
[7]  
FELDMAN HS, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P373
[8]   COMPARATIVE MOTOR-BLOCKING EFFECTS OF BUPIVACAINE AND ROPIVACAINE, A NEW AMINO AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC, IN THE RAT AND DOG [J].
FELDMAN, HS ;
COVINO, BG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (11) :1047-1052
[9]  
FELDMAN HS, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V69, P794
[10]   COMPARISON OF BUPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL IN CONTINUOUS EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA DURING LABOR [J].
JONES, G ;
PAUL, DL ;
ELTON, RA ;
MCCLURE, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 63 (03) :254-259