An early signal of CA-125 progression for ovarian cancer patients receiving maintenance treatment after complete clinical response to primary therapy

被引:39
作者
Liu, Ping-Yu
Alberts, David S.
Monk, Bradley J.
Brady, Mark
Moon, James
Markman, Maurie
机构
[1] Grp Stat Ctr, SW Oncol Grp, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Ctr Canc, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Gynecol Oncol Grp, Ctr Stat, Buffalo, NY USA
[5] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.09.4540
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose For ovarian cancer patients receiving maintenance treatment after complete clinical response to primary therapy, we tested the predictive value of the following early signal of progressive disease ( EPD) criterion based on serum CA-125: for patients with CA-125 nadir <= 10 U/mL, a confirmed value of >= 20 U/mL serves as an early signal of CA-125 progression; for patients with nadir more than 10 U/ mL, a value >= 2 x nadir that is confirmed predicts progression. Patients and Methods The EPD criterion was tested on Southwest Oncology Group trial 9701/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial 178 patients ( n = 288) and compared with Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criterion. Results For 204 patients with known progressive disease, the progression date was predated by EPD by <= 60 days in 31%, 61 to 180 days in 15%, and more than 180 days in 10% ( median, 56 days early). Of 84 progression-free patients, nine EPDs were found. Overall, 135 patients met the EPD criterion. True disease progression status was undeterminable for two patients and nine were potentially false signals, for a conservative positive predictive value of 93% ( 95% CI, 88% to 97%). Conclusion Initial testing of the proposed CA-125 criterion resulted in a low false-positive rate and early prediction of disease progression in more than 50% of the patients tested. The proposed criterion may better reflect the timing of disease progression and should be investigated further.
引用
收藏
页码:3615 / 3620
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Crawford SM, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p449S
[2]   Phase III randomized trial of 12 versus 3 months of maintenance paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after complete response to platinum and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy: A Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group trial [J].
Markman, M ;
Liu, PY ;
Wilczynski, S ;
Monk, B ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Alvarez, RD ;
Jiang, C ;
Alberts, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2460-2465
[3]   Pretreatment CA-125 and risk of relapse in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Markmann, M ;
Liu, PY ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Monk, BJ ;
Brady, M ;
Alberts, DS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (09) :1454-1458
[4]  
Nadal RM, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p270S
[5]   Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence in patients with rising serum CA-125 levels within the normal range [J].
Santillan, A ;
Garg, R ;
Zahurak, ML ;
Gardner, GJ ;
Giuntoli, RL ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Bristow, RE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (36) :9338-9343
[6]  
Tanabe H, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, p270S
[7]   Re: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [ovarian cancer] [J].
Vergote, I ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Eisenhauer, EA ;
Kristensen, GB ;
Pujade-Lauraine, E ;
Parmar, MKB ;
Friedlander, M ;
Jakobsen, A ;
Vermorken, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (18) :1534-1535