The risk of cytogenetic abnormalities in the late first trimester of pregnancies conceived through assisted reproduction

被引:16
作者
Conway, Deirdre A. [2 ]
Patel, Satin S.
Liem, Jennifer
Fan, Kenneth J.
Jalian, Ray
Williams, John, III [2 ]
Pisarska, Margareta D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Ctr Fertil & Reprod Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Infertility; assisted reproductive technology; cytogenetic abnormality; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR BIRTH-DEFECTS; CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS; INVITRO FERTILIZATION; UNITED-STATES; TECHNOLOGY; MISCARRIAGES; INFERTILITY; ANEUPLOIDY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if pregnancies conceived through infertility treatment are at increased risk of cytogenetic abnormalities in the late first trimester compared with spontaneously conceived pregnancies, or if there is increased risk when comparing less invasive infertility treatment (in vivo group) to in vitro fertilization (in vitro group). Design: Retrospective case-controlled study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): A total of 1,606 women who spontaneously conceived and 559 women who conceived through infertility treatment undergoing chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cytogenetic abnormalities diagnosed by CVS. Result(s): No difference in cytogenetic abnormalities was found when comparing spontaneously conceived pregnancies to those conceived through infertility treatment (7.0% versus 5.4%). We also found no difference in the prevalence of cytogenetic abnormalities when comparing in vivo and in vitro fertilization subgroups (4.7% versus 5.8%). Finally, no difference was found when comparing the prevalence of different types of cytogenetic abnormalities between groups. Conclusion(s): Infertility treatment does not increase the risk of carrying a cytogenetically abnormal fetus in the late first trimester, nor does it increase the preponderance for any specific type of abnormality. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;95:503-6. (C)2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 506
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome [J].
Shevell, T ;
Malone, FD ;
Vidaver, J ;
Porter, TF ;
Luthy, DA ;
Comstock, CH ;
Hankins, GD ;
Eddleman, K ;
Dolan, S ;
Dugoff, L ;
Craigo, S ;
Timor, IE ;
Carr, SR ;
Wolfe, HM ;
Bianchi, DW ;
D'Alton, ME .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (05) :1039-1045
[22]   CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS OF PREGNANCY LOSSES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ASSISTED REPRODUCTION [J].
SHIELDS, LE ;
SERAFINI, PC ;
SCHENKEN, RS ;
MOORE, CM .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1992, 9 (01) :57-60
[23]   OBSTETRIC OUTCOME OF INVITRO FERTILIZATION PREGNANCIES COMPARED WITH NORMALLY CONCEIVED PREGNANCIES [J].
TAN, SL ;
DOYLE, P ;
CAMPBELL, S ;
BERAL, V ;
RIZK, B ;
BRINSDEN, P ;
MASON, B ;
EDWARDS, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (03) :778-784
[24]   OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN SINGLETON PREGNANCIES AFTER ASSISTED REPRODUCTION [J].
TANBO, T ;
DALE, PO ;
LUNDE, O ;
MOE, N ;
ABYHOLM, T .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (02) :188-192
[25]   SINGLETON PREGNANCY AFTER IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION - EXPECTATIONS AND OUTCOME [J].
VERLAENEN, H ;
CAMMU, H ;
DERDE, MP ;
AMY, JJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (06) :906-910