Setting performance standards on complex educational assessments

被引：38

作者：

Hambleton, RK

Jaeger, RM

Plake, BS

Mills, C

机构：

[1] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA

[2] Univ N Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA

[3] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE USA

[4] Amer Inst Certified Publ Accountants, New York, NY 10036 USA

来源：

APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT | 2000年 / 24卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/01466210022031804

中图分类号：

O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;

摘要：

Performance assessments have become popular in education and credentialing, and performance standards are common for interpreting and reporting scores. However; because of the unique characteristics of these assessments compared to multiple-choice tests (such as polytomous scoring), new and valid standard-setting methods are needed. Well-known standard-setting methods are no longer applicable. A number of promising methods for setting performance standards are described and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed. Suggestions for additional research are offered.

引用

页码：355 / 366

页数：12

共 29 条

[1]

ANGOFF WH, 1971, ED MEASUREMENT

[2]

BERK RA, 1986, REV EDUC RES, V56, P137, DOI 10.3102/00346543056001137

[3]

CIZEK GJ, IN PRESS STANDARD SE

[4] A generalized examinee-centered method for setting standards on achievement tests [J].