Health outcomes. New quality measure for Medicare

被引:42
作者
Cooper, JK
Kohlmann, T
Michael, JA
Haffer, SC
Stevic, M
机构
[1] Hlth Care Financing Adm, Baltimore, MD 21244 USA
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[3] Arizona Peer Review Org, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
aged; health status; quality measurement; Medicare; SF-36;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/13.1.9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. A new measurement of health care quality for Medicare beneficiaries has been implemented by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). This paper describes the program, presents baseline data and highlights associated issues. Design. The Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) is a longitudinal cohort mail survey Changes in population health status after 2 years will be evaluated on an individual plan level. Setting. Two-hundred and eighty-seven US Medicare managed care plans. Main outcomes measures. Physical component and mental component summary scales derived from the SF-36. Findings. Baseline data documented lower health status in older populations, while functional limitations and disease prevalence were higher. Among different plans, mean functional levels were found to be similar, although a few plans contained populations with exceptionally low levels. These data do not support the assertion that enrolees in for-profit plans are healthier than non-profit plans. Conclusions/implications. The HOS is the first large-scale program to evaluate health outcomes among older Americans. HCFA recognizes several technical and policy issues. Technical issues include possible biased reporting for subpopulations, the validity of prosy responses and respondent burden. Policy issues concern the appropriateness of using a generic measure such as the SF-36 and how much change in health status can be attributed to quality of health care. HCFA plans to extend the HOS to beneficiaries in traditional Medicare. The HOS project is expected to encourage more efforts to maintain or improve the health status of the Medicare managed care population.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Quality of health care .4. The origins of the quality-of-care debate [J].
Blumenthal, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (15) :1146-1149
[2]   TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE EUROQOL AND COMPARING IT WITH THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BRAZIER, J ;
JONES, N ;
KIND, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) :169-180
[3]   Quality of health care .2. Measuring quality of care [J].
Brook, RH ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Cleary, PD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :966-970
[4]   The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Galvin, RW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :1000-1005
[5]   Health care policy - Outcomes research: Measuring the end results of health care [J].
Clancy, CM ;
Eisenberg, JM .
SCIENCE, 1998, 282 (5387) :245-246
[6]   Proxy response patterns among the aged: Effects on estimates of health status and medical care utilization from the 1982-1984 long-term care surveys [J].
Corder, LS ;
Woodbury, MA ;
Manton, KG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :173-182
[7]   Databases in the next millennium [J].
Davidoff, F .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (08) :770-774
[8]   Rolling down the runway - The challenges ahead for quality report cards [J].
Epstein, AM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (21) :1691-1696
[9]   Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey [J].
Fukuhara, S ;
Ware, JE ;
Kosinski, M ;
Wada, S ;
Gandek, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1045-1053
[10]  
GIACOMINI M, 1995, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V16, P401