Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients receiving metabolic inhibitors

被引:17
作者
Akhlaghi, F
Keogh, AM
McLachlan, AJ
Kaan, A
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Heart & Lung Transplant Unit, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp, Victor Chang Res Inst, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1053-2498(00)00234-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitors of cyclosporine metabolism are commonly co-administered with cyclosporine in transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to compare cyclosporine pharmacokinetics using the conventional formulation (Sandimmune) and after switching to the microemulsion (Neoral) formulation, in stable heart transplant recipients receiving various cyclosporine metabolic inhibitors. Methods: Steady-state blood concentration-time profiles of Sandimmune were studied in 47 transplant recipients receiving either cyclosporine alone (Group A, n = 11) or in combination with diltiazem (120 mg/day, Group B, n = 11), ketoconazole (200 mg/day, Group C, n = 13), or both ketoconazole and diltiazem (200 and 120 mg/day, respectively, Group D, n = 12), and restudied 1 week after switching to Neoral. Results: Neoral resulted in more rapid cyclosporine absorption as judged by the shorter absorption half-lives in all groups (p < 0.05). The mean percentage increase in the values of area-under-the-concentration-time curve was 42% and 37.5% higher for Neoral compared with Sandimmune for Groups A and B, respectively, but only 5.4% higher for Group C and 9.5% higher for Group D. The mean morning trough concentration of cyclosporine was not significantly different after administration of Neoral compared with Sandimmune in any of the groups studied (179 vs 167 <mu>g/liter for Group A; 171 vs 147 mug/liter for Group B; 189 vs 194 mug/liter for Group C; and 181 vs 201 mug/liter for Group D). Neoral did not alter serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, creatinine, and urea in any of the study groups. Conclusions: The faster absorption and improved bioavailability of cyclosporine (around 40%) with Neoral compared with Sandimmune was not seen in patients receiving ketoconazole, where in fact cyclosporine bioavailability was already maximal. Mean morning trough levels of cyclosporine did not reflect the improvement in bioavailability seen in patients switching from Sandimmune to Neoral. Cyclosporine dose adjustment may be needed when switching from Sandimmune to Neoral for patients not receiving sparing agents or who receive diltiazem, but trough levels cannot necessarily be relied upon to determine the degree of adjustment needed. For patients on ketoconazole, the absorption profile is already optimized and no dosage alteration seems necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 438
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Clinical benefit of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine 2-HR post-dose levels compared with trough levels in stable heart transplant patients [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Elstein, E ;
de Varennes, B ;
Barkun, JS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (12) :1839-1842
[2]   CYCLOSPORINE CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS [J].
FAHR, A .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1993, 24 (06) :472-495
[3]   CYCLOSPORINE DOSE REDUCTION BY KETOCONAZOLE ADMINISTRATION IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS [J].
FIRST, MR ;
SCHROEDER, TJ ;
ALEXANDER, JW ;
STEPHENS, GW ;
WEISKITTEL, P ;
MYRE, SA ;
PESCE, AJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 51 (02) :365-370
[4]   A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin - Pharmacokinetic and clinical features [J].
Friman, S ;
Backman, L .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 30 (03) :181-193
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF KETOCONAZOLE ON THE INTESTINAL METABOLISM AND BIOAVAILABILITY OF CYCLOSPORINE [J].
GOMEZ, DY ;
WACHER, VJ ;
TOMLANOVICH, SJ ;
HEBERT, MF ;
BENET, LZ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 58 (01) :15-19
[6]   Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection -: Results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8) [J].
Grant, D ;
Kneteman, N ;
Tchervenkov, J ;
Roy, A ;
Murphy, G ;
Tan, A ;
Hendricks, L ;
Guilbault, N ;
Levy, G .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (08) :1133-1137
[7]   Diltiazem-cyclosporin pharmacokinetic interaction - dose-response relationship [J].
Jones, TE ;
Morris, RG ;
Mathew, TH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 44 (05) :499-504
[8]   KETOCONAZOLE TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR CYCLOSPORINE AFTER CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION [J].
KEOGH, A ;
SPRATT, P ;
MCCOSKER, G ;
MACDONALD, P ;
MUNDY, J ;
KAAN, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (10) :628-633
[9]   1ST-PASS METABOLISM OF CYCLOSPORINE BY THE GUT [J].
KOLARS, JC ;
AWNI, WM ;
MERION, RM ;
WATKINS, PB .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8781) :1488-1490
[10]   CYCLOSPORINE METABOLISM IN HUMAN-LIVER - IDENTIFICATION OF A CYTOCHROME-P-450III GENE FAMILY AS THE MAJOR CYCLOSPORINE-METABOLIZING ENZYME EXPLAINS INTERACTIONS OF CYCLOSPORINE WITH OTHER DRUGS [J].
KRONBACH, T ;
FISCHER, V ;
MEYER, UA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1988, 43 (06) :630-635