Cap-and-trade policy challenges: A tale of three markets

被引:51
作者
Colby, BG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3146957
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cap-and-trade policy instruments have been applied to a number of environmental problems, with varying success. This article examines cap-and-trade programs for SO2 allowances, fishery quotas, and water rights. Design and implementation of cap-and-trade mechanisms involves challenging policy tradeoffs: accommodating equity concerns, balancing use levels with resource conditions, facilitating trans actions, accounting for externalities, assuring adequate monitoring, and documenting welfare gains. Efficient trading mechanisms are more readily implemented when there is a strong political or legal mandate to cap resource use and trades are perceived as a means to ease adjustment to use limits.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 658
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Anderson L.G., 1986, EC FISHERIES MANAGEM
[2]  
Anderson T. L., 1997, WATER MARKETS PRIMIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DEV INDIVIDUAL FISHI
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTERBASIN TRANSFER
[5]  
[Anonymous], WATER TRANSFER PROCE
[6]  
BAILEY EM, 1996, 96002 MIT CTR EN ENV
[7]  
BOHI DR, 1997, ELECT J, V10, P67
[8]  
BOHI DR, 1994, ELECT J, V7, P20
[9]   MODELING INTRASTATE AND INTERSTATE MARKETS FOR COLORADO RIVER WATER-RESOURCES [J].
BOOKER, JF ;
YOUNG, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (01) :66-87
[10]   The SO2 emissions trading program: Cost savings without allowance trades [J].
Burtraw, D .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 1996, 14 (02) :79-94