Casemix adjustment of managed care claims data using the Clinical Classification for Health Policy Research method

被引:94
作者
Cowen, ME
Dusseau, DJ
Toth, BG
Guisinger, C
Zodet, MW
Shyr, Y
机构
[1] St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Dept Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Huron Valley Physicians Assoc, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
managed care; health services resource utilization; casemix adjustment;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199807000-00016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to explore the use of the Clinical Classification for Health Policy Research (CCHPR) as a casemix adjustment method for examining physician practice patterns. METHODS. The data source was 2 years of administrative claims from an 86,000 member health maintenance organization in southeastern Michigan. The CCHPR version 2 algorithm, which is in the public domain, was used to assign each claim to one of 260 clinical categories. CCHPR and age-sex categories were used as explanatory variables in multiple linear regression models with approved claims payments in dollars as the outcome variable. Regressions were performed retrospectively for 1994 and 1995, and with 1994 claims' history to predict 1995 utilization. Similar regressions were performed with age-sex categories alone, and also with the ambulatory diagnostic groups. RESULTS. The adjusted R-2 value of the retrospective regression models fur total approved dollars was 0.42 for both study years when CCHPR categories were used. In contrast, age-sex explanatory variables alone achieved an R-2 of 0,02. CONCLUSIONS. The CCHPR method appears to be a promising tool to understand variability in physician resource utilization in managed care.
引用
收藏
页码:1108 / 1113
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AS AN IDEAL IN HEALTH-CARE
    BERWICK, DM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [2] Duffy SQ, 1996, AHCPR PUBLICATION
  • [3] Elixhauser A, 1996, AHCPR PUBLICATION, V96-0046
  • [4] Elixhauser A, 1993, AHCPR PUBLICATION, V93-0043
  • [5] Ellis RP, 1995, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V32, P418
  • [6] Ellis RP, 1996, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V17, P101
  • [7] Taking health status into account when setting capitation rates - A comparison of risk-adjustment methods
    Fowles, JB
    Weiner, JP
    Knutson, D
    Fowler, E
    Tucker, AM
    Ireland, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (16): : 1316 - 1321
  • [8] GIACOMINI M, 1995, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V16, P401
  • [9] IEZONNI LI, 1994, RISK ADJUSTMENT MEAS
  • [10] IEZZONI LI, 1994, RISK ADJUSTMENT CURR, pCH10