Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2

被引:57
作者
Grann, VR
Whang, W
Jacobson, JS
Heitjan, DF
Antman, KH
Neugut, AI
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.494
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for three specific BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Methods: We used a Markov model and Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening for three specific mutations in a population in which their prevalence is 2.5% and the associated cancer risks are 56% for breast cancer and 16% for ovarian cancer. We assumed that the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 98% and 99%, respectively, that bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy would reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45%, and that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy would reduce breast cancer risk by 90%. We used Medicare payment data for treatment costs and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for cancer survival. Results: Our model suggests that genetic screening of this population could prolong average nondiscounted survival by 38 days (95% probability interval, 22 to 57 days) for combined surgery, 33 days (95% probability interval, 18 to 43 days) for mastectomy, Il days (95% probability interval, 4 to 25 days) for oophorectomy, and 6 days (95% probability interval, 3 to 8 days) for surveillance, The respective cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year saved, with a discount rate of 3%, are $20,717, $29,970, $72,780, and $134,273. Conclusion: In this Ashkenazi Jewish population, with a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic screening may significantly increase average survival and, depending on costs and screening/treatment strategies, may be cost-effective by the standards of accepted cancer screening tests. According to our model, screening is cost-effective only if all women who test positive undergo prophylactic surgery. These estimates require confirmation through prospective observational studies and clinical trials. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 500
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] THE MARKOV PROCESS IN MEDICAL PROGNOSIS
    BECK, JR
    PAUKER, SG
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1983, 3 (04) : 419 - 458
  • [2] BODENHEIMER TS, 1995, UNDESTANDING HLTH PO, P143
  • [3] THE USE OF GENE TESTS TO DETECT HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION TO CANCER - ECONOMIC-CONSIDERATIONS
    BROWN, ML
    KESSLER, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (15) : 1131 - 1136
  • [4] Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Burke, W
    Daly, M
    Garber, J
    Botkin, J
    Kahn, MJE
    Lynch, P
    McTierman, A
    Offit, K
    Perlman, J
    Petersen, G
    Thomson, E
    Varricchio, C
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12): : 997 - 1003
  • [5] CARDINALE V, 1996, 1996 DRUG TOPICS RED
  • [6] CUMMINGS S, 1998, P ASCO, V17, P3
  • [7] SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER
    EDDY, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (05) : 389 - 399
  • [8] SCREENING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER
    EDDY, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (03) : 214 - 226
  • [9] Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
  • [10] Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients
    Grann, VR
    Panageas, KS
    Whang, W
    Antman, KH
    Neugut, AI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (03) : 979 - 985