Pharmacist conscience clauses and access to oral contraceptives

被引:4
作者
Flynn, D. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Salve Regina Univ, Humanities Dept, Newport, RI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.2007.021337
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of conscience clauses after the 1973 US Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade allowed physicians and nurses to opt out of medical procedures, particularly abortions, to which they were morally opposed. In recent years pharmacists have requested the same consideration with regard to dispensing some medicines. This paper examines the pharmacists' role and their professional and moral obligations to patients in the light of recent refusals by pharmacists to dispense oral contraceptives. A review of John Rawls's concepts of the "original position'' and the "veil of ignorance'', along with consideration of the concept of compartmentalisation, are used to assess pharmacists' requests and the moral and legal rights of patients to have their prescriptive needs met.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 520
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
American Pharmacists Association, COD ETH PHARM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, On the Pill: A Social History of Oral Contraceptives, 1950-1970
[3]  
[Anonymous], SEXUAL CHEM
[4]  
Atighetchi D, 1994, Med Law, V13, P717
[5]   Revisiting pharmacists' refusals to dispense emergency contraception [J].
Baergen, Ralph ;
Owens, Christopher .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05) :1277-1282
[6]  
BOLLINGER C, 2004, PREVENTION, V56, P150
[7]  
*COMM MA DEP HLTH, CONS TIPS
[8]  
GOLD RB, 2000, GUTTMACHER REPORT PU
[9]  
HERSH J, 2005, POETICIZED CULTURE R
[10]  
JOSSI F, 2005, CONT SEXUALITY, V39, P4