Lanzoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of acid peptic disorders

被引:42
作者
Blum, RA
机构
[1] State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Clin. Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NY 14209-1194
关键词
costs; dosage; gastrointestinal drugs; lansoprazole; omeprazole; pharmacokinetics; toxicity; ulcers;
D O I
10.1093/ajhp/53.12.1401
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and dosage and administration of lansoprazole and omeprazole are reviewed. Lansoprazole and omeprazole are proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). These agents bind covalently to hydrogen/potassium-exchanging adenosine triphosphatase in gastric parietal cells, rendering the molecule nonfunctional and inhibiting the secretion of gastric acid. The bioavailability of lansoprazole is 85%; that of omeprazole is 54%. Although lansoprazole and omeprazole have a plasma half-life of less than 2 hours, the duration of action is more than 24 hours. Clinical trials have shown lansoprazole and omeprazole to be effective in the treatment of duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, peptic ulcer disease involving Helicobacter pylori infection, recurrent ulcers, ulcers induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, reflux esophagitis, Barrett esophagus, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In many cases, these PPIs were more effective than histamine H-2-receptor antagonists or worked when the latter failed. Lansoprazole and omeprazole have similar adverse-effect profiles and are well tolerated in both long- and short-term therapy. The dosage and duration of therapy vary with the condition being treated or the individual patient. Dosage adjustments should be considered only in the case of lansoprazole in patients with severe liver disease. Lansoprazole and omeprazole are highly specific in blocking a critical step in gastric acid production and have been found to be safe and effective in the treatment of many acid peptic disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1415
页数:15
相关论文
共 174 条
[1]  
AARONSON R, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, pA1307
[2]  
ANDERSSON T, 1991, Drug Investigation, V3, P45
[3]   H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST-REFRACTORY ULCER - ITS PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND TREATMENT [J].
ARAKAWA, T ;
HIGUCHI, K ;
FUKUDA, T ;
NAKAMURA, H ;
KOBAYASHI, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 13 :S129-S133
[4]   OMEPRAZOLE (20-MG DAILY) VERSUS CIMETIDINE (1200-MG DAILY) IN DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING AND PAIN RELIEF [J].
ARCHAMBAULT, AP ;
PARE, P ;
BAILEY, RJ ;
NAVERT, H ;
WILLIAMS, CN ;
FREEMAN, HJ ;
BAKER, SJ ;
MARCON, NE ;
HUNT, RH ;
SUTHERLAND, L ;
KEPKAY, DL ;
SAIBIL, FG ;
HAWKEN, K ;
FARLEY, A ;
LEVESQUE, D ;
FERGUSON, J ;
WESTIN, JA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 94 (05) :1130-1134
[5]  
Asaka M, 1992, Nihon Rinsho, V50, P104
[6]  
BARDHAN K D, 1991, Gastroenterology, V100, pA30
[7]  
BARDHAN KD, 1988, GUT, V29, pA724
[8]  
BARDHAN KD, 1994, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V8, P215
[9]  
BARDHAN KD, 1988, POSTGRAD MED J, V64, P40
[10]   A COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT DOSES OF OMEPRAZOLE VERSUS RANITIDINE IN TREATMENT OF DUODENAL-ULCERS [J].
BARDHAN, KD ;
PORRO, GB ;
BOSE, K ;
DALY, M ;
HINCHLIFFE, RFC ;
JONSSON, E ;
LAZZARONI, M ;
NAESDAL, J ;
RIKNER, L ;
WALAN, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 8 (04) :408-413