Comparison of Chinese and Korean companies in ICT global standardization: Essential patent analysis

被引:32
作者
Kang, Byeongwoo [1 ,2 ]
Huo, Dong [2 ]
Motohashi, Kazuyuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dev Econ IDE JETRO, Chiba, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Technol Management Innovat, Tokyo 1138654, Japan
关键词
China; Korea; Essential patents; 'CT; Standardization; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; TECHNOLOGICAL REGIMES; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; TD-SCDMA; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; CAPABILITY; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2014.09.004
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The latecomers from Asia China and Korea started to participate in information and communication technology (ICT) global standardizations as they accumulated technological capabilities. We observed the current situation of ICT global standardizations in those countries by analyzing the mobile communications standards, WCDMA and LTE, and derived interesting findings and meaningful implications from the analysis. First, this paper provides evidence of the differences in Chinese and Korean standard strategies; China is creating its own standard whereas Korea goes with global standardization. Second, this paper shows the subsequent results of the different strategies. In detail, we conducted an analysis based on (declared) essential patents in WCDMA and LTE. The results indicate that China and Korea hold a significant number of essential patents and their numbers compete with those of leading countries. However, the analysis shows that Korea accumulated domestic knowledge that enables the country to actively participate in standardization,but China still heavily relies on foreign knowledge, probably because China is attempting to create its own standard and accumulating knowledge takes a long time despite its efforts.Our findings have several implications for leading countries and other following countries. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 913
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 100 YEARS TELEPHONE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ECONOMETRIC ANAL
[3]   Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM [J].
Bekkers, R ;
Verspagen, B ;
Smits, J .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2002, 26 (3-4) :171-188
[4]  
Bekkers R., 2012, STUDY IRR POLICIES R
[5]   Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators [J].
Bekkers, Rudi ;
Martinelli, Arianna .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (07) :1192-1216
[6]   An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards [J].
Bekkers, Rudi ;
Bongard, Rene ;
Nuvolari, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (07) :1001-1015
[7]   Filing behaviour regarding essential patents in industry standards [J].
Berger, Florian ;
Blind, Knut ;
Thumm, Nikolaus .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (01) :216-225
[8]   Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation [J].
Breschi, S ;
Malerba, F ;
Orsenigo, L .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 110 (463) :388-410
[9]  
Carpenter M.P., 1981, World Patent Information, V3, P160, DOI DOI 10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3
[10]  
Dahlman E., 2008, 3G Evolution: HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband, V2nd