Cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada

被引:22
作者
Trussell, J
Wiebe, E
Shochet, T
Guilbert, É
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Family Practice, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, St Foy, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01333-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada. Methods: We modeled cost savings when a single emergency contraceptive treatment was provided after unprotected intercourse and when women were provided emergency contraceptive pills in advance. Results: Each dollar spent on a single treatment saved $1.19-$2.35 (in Canadian currency), depending on the regimen and on assumptions about savings from costs avoided by preventing mistimed births. The dedicated products Preven (Shire Canada, Inc., Oakville, Ontario) and Plan B (Paladin Labs, Inc., Montreal) were cost-saving even under the least favorable assumption that mistimed births prevented today occur 2 years later. Each dollar spent on advance provision of Preven saved $1.24-$12.23, depending on the regular contraception method, on how consistently emergency contraception was used when needed, and on whether mistimed births were averted forever or simply delayed. Plan B was almost always cost-saving, although less so. Conclusion: Emergency contraception was cost-saving whether provided when the emergency occurred or in advance to be used as needed. More extensive use of emergency contraception could save considerable medical costs by reducing unintended pregnancies. (Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:789-93. (C) 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 793
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ABMA JC, 1997, VITAL HLTH STAT, V23, P25
[2]  
Brown SarahS., 1995, The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families
[3]   Contraceptive failure rates: New estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth [J].
Fu, HS ;
Darroch, JE ;
Haas, T ;
Ranjit, N .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 31 (02) :56-63
[4]   The effects of self-administering emergency contraception [J].
Glasier, A ;
Baird, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (01) :1-4
[5]  
Grimes D, 1998, LANCET, V352, P428
[6]  
GUILLEBAUD J, 1995, FERTIL CONTROL REV, V4, P18
[7]   Unintended pregnancy in the United States [J].
Henshaw, SK .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (01) :24-+
[8]   Knowledge and use of hormonal emergency contraception in Finland [J].
Kosunen, E ;
Sihvo, S ;
Hemminki, E .
CONTRACEPTION, 1997, 55 (03) :153-157
[9]  
*STAT CAN, 1997, THER AB 1995 HLTH RE, V9, P55
[10]   Preventing unintended pregnancy: The cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception [J].
Trussell, J ;
Koenig, J ;
Ellertson, C ;
Stewart, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (06) :932-937