Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments

被引:176
作者
Boutron, Isabelle
Moher, David
Altman, Douglas G.
Schulz, Kenneth F.
Ravaud, Philippe
机构
[1] Univ Paris 07 Denis Diderot, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Rech Clin, INSERM U738, AP HP,Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, F-75018 Paris, France
[2] Univ Ottawa, Chalmers Res Grp, Childrens Hosp, E Ontario Res Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[4] Family Hlth Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The conduct of randomized, controlled trials of nonpharmacologic treatments presents specific challenges that are not adequately addressed in trial reports. Objective: To develop an extension of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement for trials of nonpharmacologic treatments. Design: A consensus meeting was organized to develop an extension of the CONSORT Statement that addresses randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments. To prepare for the meeting, a survey was conducted to identify the specific issues for discussion. Setting: Consensus meeting in Paris, France. Participants: A total of 33 experts attended the meeting. The experts were methodologists (n = 17); surgeons (n = 6); editors (n = 5); and clinicians involved in rehabilitation (n = 1), psychotherapy (n = 2), education (n = 1), and implantable devices (n = 1). Measurements: Experts indicated which of the 22 items on the CONSORT checklist should be modified or which additional items should be added specifically for nonpharmacologic treatments. During a 3-day consensus meeting, all items were discussed and additional methodological issues related to nonpharmacologic research were identified. Results: The consensus was that 11 items on the CONSORT checklist needed some modifications for nonpharmacologic trials: item 1 (title and abstract), item 3 (participants), item 4 (interventions), item 7 (sample size), item 8 (randomization), item 11 (blinding), item 12 (statistical methods), item 13 (participant flow), item 15 (baseline data), item 20 (discussion: interpretation), and item 21 (generalizability). In addition, the meeting participants added 1 item related to implementation of the intervention. Limitation: Evidence was not always available to support the inclusion of each checklist item. Conclusion: The methods and processes used to develop this extension could be used for other reporting guidelines. The use of this extension to the CONSORT Statement should improve the quality of reporting randomized, controlled trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:W60 / W66
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]   Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2005, 125 :8-13
[3]   Surgical research revisited: clinical trials in the cardiothoracic surgical literature [J].
Anyanwu, AC ;
Treasure, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 25 (03) :299-303
[4]   Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery - Can we do better? [J].
Balasubramanian, Sabapathy P. ;
Wiener, Martin ;
Alshameeri, Zeiad ;
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath ;
Elbourne, Diana ;
Reed, Malcolm W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (05) :663-667
[5]   Application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) in the fracture care literature [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Lochner, H ;
Sprague, S ;
Tornetta, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (03) :485-489
[6]   The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000 [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Richards, RR ;
Sprague, S ;
Schemitsch, EH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (03) :388-396
[7]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[8]   A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus [J].
Boutron, I ;
Moher, D ;
Tugwell, P ;
Giraudeau, B ;
Poiraudeau, S ;
Nizard, R ;
Ravaud, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (12) :1233-1240
[9]   Methodological differences in clinical trials evaluating nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis [J].
Boutron, I ;
Tubach, F ;
Giraudeau, B ;
Ravaud, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1062-1070
[10]   Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Moher, David ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (04) :295-309