Reversal of tamoxifen resistance of human breast carcinomas in vivo by neutralizing antibodies to transforming growth factor-β

被引:60
作者
Arteaga, CL
Koli, KM
Dugger, TC
Clarke, R
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med,Vanderbilt Canc Ctr, Dept Med,Div Med Oncol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Cell Biol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 1999年 / 91卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/91.1.46
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: Overexpression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta has been reported in human breast carcinomas resistant to antiestrogen tamoxifen, but the role of TGF-beta in this resistant phenotype is unclear. We investigated whether inhibition of TGF-beta 2, which is overexpressed in LCC2 tamoxifen-resistant human breast cancer cells, could modify antiestrogen resistance, Methods: TGF-beta 2 expression was evaluated in LCC2 cells and tamoxifen-sensitive LCC1 cells by northern blot analysis, Secreted TGF-beta activity was quantified by use of an I-125-TGF-beta competitive radioreceptor assay. Sensitivity to tamoxifen was measured in a soft agarose colony-forming assay and in a xenograft model in nude and beige/nude mice. Natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity was measured by Cr-51 release from LCC1 and LCC2 cell targets coincubated with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Decrease in TGF-beta 2 expression in LCC2 cells was achieved by treatment with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and confirmed by TGF-beta 2 immunoblot analysis, Results and Conclusions: The proliferative response of LCC2 cells to tamoxifen in vitro was not altered by TGF-P neutralizing antibodies. However, established LCC2 tumors in nude mice treated with tamoxifen plus TGF-beta antibodies failed to grow, whereas tumors Created with tamoxifen plus a control antibody continued to proliferate. This reversal of tamoxifen resistance by TGF-beta antibodies did not occur in beige/nude mice, which lack NK-cell function, suggesting that immune mechanisms may be involved in the antitumor effects of tamoxifen, Antisense TGF-beta 2 oligodeoxynucleotides enhanced the NK sensitivity of LCC2 cells in the presence of tamoxifen, Finally, LCC1-tumors were markedly more sensitive to tamoxifen in NK-active than in NK-deficient mice. Implications: These data suggest that host NK function mediates, in part, the antitumor effect of tamoxifen and that TGF-beta 2 may abrogate this mechanism, thus contributing to tamoxifen resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]
AKIMOTO M, 1986, CANCER DETECT PREV, V9, P311
[2]
INFLUENCE OF ESTRADIOL AND TAMOXIFEN ON SUSCEPTIBILITY OF HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELL-LINES TO LYSIS BY LYMPHOKINE-ACTIVATED KILLER-CELLS [J].
ALBERTINI, MR ;
GIBSON, DFC ;
ROBINSON, SP ;
HOWARD, SP ;
TANS, K ;
LINDSTROM, MJ ;
ROBINSON, RR ;
TORMEY, DC ;
JORDAN, VC ;
SONDEL, PM .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY, 1992, 11 (01) :30-39
[3]
AN T, 1987, AM J PATHOL, V128, P52
[4]
ARTEAGA CL, 1990, CELL GROWTH DIFFER, V1, P367
[5]
ARTEAGA CL, 1993, CELL GROWTH DIFFER, V4, P193
[6]
ANTI-TRANSFORMING GROWTH-FACTOR (TGF)-BETA ANTIBODIES INHIBIT BREAST-CANCER CELL TUMORIGENICITY AND INCREASE MOUSE SPLEEN NATURAL-KILLER-CELL ACTIVITY - IMPLICATIONS FOR A POSSIBLE ROLE OF TUMOR-CELL HOST TGF-BETA INTERACTIONS IN HUMAN BREAST-CANCER PROGRESSION [J].
ARTEAGA, CL ;
HURD, SD ;
WINNIER, AR ;
JOHNSON, MD ;
FENDLY, BM ;
FORBES, JT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1993, 92 (06) :2569-2576
[7]
ARTEAGA CL, 1996, BREAST CANC RES TREA, V41, pA220
[8]
Multiple forms of TGF-beta(1), in breast tissues: A biologically active form of the small latent complex of TGF-beta 1 [J].
Baillie, R ;
Coombes, RC ;
Smith, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (09) :1566-1573
[9]
Baral E, 1996, INT J CANCER, V66, P214
[10]
TARGET-CELLS ARE SENSITIZED FOR CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE-MEDIATED DESTRUCTION BY ESTRADIOL AND TAMOXIFEN [J].
BARAL, E ;
NAGY, E ;
BERCZI, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 58 (01) :64-68