Sourcing with Deferred Payment and Inspection under Supplier Product Adulteration Risk

被引:95
作者
Rui, Huaxia [1 ]
Lai, Guoming [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Simon Business Sch, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
quality control; deferred payment; inspection; moral hazard; TRADE CREDIT CONTRACTS; QUALITY; INFORMATION; CHAIN;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12313
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We study the deferred payment and inspection mechanisms for mitigating supplier product adulteration, with endogenous procurement decision and general defect discovery process. We first derive the optimal deferred payment contract, which reveals that either entire or partial deferral can arise, depending on the moral hazard severity and the information accumulation rate. Because of the supplier's incentive to adulterate, the optimal procurement quantity under deferred payment generally is smaller than the first-best quantity. We then investigate the inspection mechanism and characterize the equilibrium. We find that under the inspection mechanism, the optimal procurement quantity is no less than the first best. A comparison between these two mechanisms shows that the deferred payment mechanism generally can outperform the inspection mechanism when either the market size is small or the profit margin is low. However, we find that these two mechanisms can also be complementary, for which we characterize a necessary condition.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 946
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Babich V, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGING RISK, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-778-5_8
[2]   Managing Opportunistic Supplier Product Adulteration: Deferred Payments, Inspection, and Combined Mechanisms [J].
Babich, Volodymyr ;
Tang, Christopher S. .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 14 (02) :301-314
[3]   Performance measurement and design in supply chains [J].
Baiman, S ;
Fischer, PE ;
Rajan, MV .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (01) :173-188
[4]   Information, contracting, and quality costs [J].
Baiman, S ;
Fischer, PE ;
Rajan, MV .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (06) :776-789
[5]   Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain [J].
Balachandran, KR ;
Radhakrishnan, S .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (08) :1266-1277
[6]  
Brunet P. Y., 2009, WORKING PAPER
[7]  
Brunet P. Y., 2007, WORKING PAPER
[8]   Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts [J].
Chao, Gary H. ;
Iravani, Seyed M. R. ;
Savaskan, R. Canan .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (07) :1122-1138
[9]  
Chaudhuri Saabira., 2020, Wall Street Journal
[10]   A Stochastic Inventory Model with Trade Credit [J].
Gupta, Diwakar ;
Wang, Lei .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 11 (01) :4-18