Parsing Public/Private Differences in Work Motivation and Performance: An Experimental Study

被引:67
作者
Brewer, Gene A. [1 ,2 ]
Brewer, Gene A., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/mur030
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article echoes recent calls for public management research to focus on core questions and utilize multiple methods to advance the state of knowledge in the field. In this article, we call for more experimental research on the public/private distinction, which is a core public management research topic. We then conduct a pilot experimental study that provides new insights-and what seem to be major implications-about this important topic. Specifically, we study individuals' vigilance when performing work in a government funded research project compared with a business funded research project. Our results show that individuals are significantly faster, more accurate, and more vigilant when their work is funded by a government agency rather than a private business firm. Two major implications are (1) government provision of goods and services that require faster, more accurate, and more vigilant workers (e.g., airport security or emergency responders) may be superior to private provision, ceteris paribus; and (2) our participants in this study, who are college students, seem to perform better when working for government rather than for the private sector. This is heartening because, with the "quiet crisis" looming over government, many seasoned public servants will soon be replaced by these younger workers. The strengths and limitations of the study are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:I347 / I362
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   DISSERTATION RESEARCH IN PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION AND COGNATE FIELDS - AN ASSESSMENT OF METHODS AND QUALITY [J].
ADAMS, GB ;
WHITE, JD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1994, 54 (06) :565-576
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor.
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UNDERSTANDING MANAGI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic, DOI DOI 10.2307/3323623
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Economic Approaches in Political Science
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Obedience to authority
[8]   THE BIG QUESTIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT [J].
BEHN, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1995, 55 (04) :313-324
[9]  
Bouckaert Geert., 2008, Managing Performance: International Comparisons
[10]  
Boyne A., 2010, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PE