PROTEGE as a vehicle for developing medical terminological systems

被引:14
作者
Abu-Hanna, A
Cornet, R
de Keizer, N
Crubezy, M
Tu, S
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Informat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
medical ontologies; terminological systems; PROTEGE; knowledge representation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.02.005
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A medical terminological system (TS) is essentially an ontology consisting of concepts, attributes and relationships pertaining to medical terms. There are many TSs around today, most of which are essentially frame-based. Various efforts have been made to get a better understanding of the requirements and the conceptual and formal structures of TSs. However, the actual implementation of a TS consisted so far of ad hoc approaches starting from scratch and, due to ad hoc semantics of the representation, the interoperability with external applications of the knowledge represented is diminished. In recent years, P-ROTEGE has been gaining in popularity as a software environment for the development of knowledge-based systems. It provides an architecture for integrating frame-based ontologies with knowledge acquisition and other applications operating on these ontologies. In its recent version, P-ROTEGE provides the ability to specify meta-classes and -slots. This contributes to an explicit separability of knowledge levels and allows for an increased modeling flexibility. These properties, and the fact that it complies with a standard knowledge model, enable P-ROTEGE to be an attractive candidate for the implementation of frame-based TSs. This paper investigates how to specify a TS in P-ROTEGE and demonstrates this in a specific application in the domain of intensive care. Our approach is characterized by the utilization of a conceptual framework for understanding TSs and mapping its components onto P-ROTEGE constructs. This results in specifications of knowledge components for the implementation of terminological systems. The significance of our work stems from the generality of these specifications. This facilitates their reuse, leading to a principled process for the development of terminological systems for a broad spectrum of medical domains. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 663
页数:25
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ABUHANNA A, 1994, IEEE EXPERT, V9, P53, DOI 10.1109/64.331490
[2]  
[Anonymous], DATABASE SYSTEMS, DOI DOI 10.1145/320434.320440
[3]   Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: Completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity [J].
Campbell, JR ;
Carpenter, P ;
Sneiderman, C ;
Cohn, S ;
Chute, CG ;
Warren, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1997, 4 (03) :238-251
[4]  
Chaudhri VK, 1998, FIFTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-98) AND TENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE (IAAI-98) - PROCEEDINGS, P600
[5]   A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States: Development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications [J].
Chute, CG ;
Cohn, SP ;
Campbell, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 5 (06) :503-510
[6]  
Cimino JJ, 1998, METHOD INFORM MED, V37, P394
[7]   KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACHES TO THE MAINTENANCE OF A LARGE CONTROLLED MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY [J].
CIMINO, JJ ;
CLAYTON, PD ;
HRIPCSAK, G ;
JOHNSON, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1994, 1 (01) :35-50
[8]  
Cornet R, 2003, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V2780, P61
[9]  
de Keizer NF, 1999, METHOD INFORM MED, V38, P102
[10]  
de Keizer NF, 2000, METHOD INFORM MED, V39, P22