Equity and need when waiting for total hip replacement surgery

被引:38
作者
Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, JM
Reeves, BC
Morris, RW
Murray, DW
Gregg, PJ
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[3] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, London, England
[4] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[5] Middlesbrough Gen Hosp, S Tees Hosp NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England
关键词
hip replacement surgery; outcomes; waiting time;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00448.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To explore sociodemographic and health status factors associated with waiting times both for first outpatient appointment and for total hip replacement surgery (THR). Methods A survey of THR in five former English regions was conducted between September 1996 and October 1997. Every patient listed for THR was asked to fill out a questionnaire preoperatively. This questionnaire included the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire and two questions on the length of time patients waited for an outpatient appointment and subsequently for their operation. Results From multiple logistic regression analyses, region, private vs. public sector, housing tenure and preoperative OHS were all independently associated with a waiting time for an outpatient appointment for > 3 months. Region, housing tenure and gender were also independently associated with a wait of greater than or equal to 6 months on the surgical waiting list. Conclusions A large proportion of patients had long waiting times both for an outpatient appointment and while on a surgical waiting list. There were significant differences in waiting time according to social, geographical and health care system factors. Patients with a worse pain and disability at surgery waited longer for an outpatient appointment. The longer patient waited, the worse was their pain and disability, suggesting that patients were not prioritized by these criteria. Benefits of prioritizing should be tested.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
GROMMETS, TONSILLECTOMIES, AND DEPRIVATION IN SCOTLAND [J].
BISSET, AF ;
RUSSELL, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6937) :1129-1132
[2]
Brownlow HC, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P128
[3]
Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Murray, D ;
Carr, A .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 5 (02) :81-88
[4]
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :185-190
[5]
Dawson J, 1996, J Health Serv Res Policy, V1, P224
[6]
Prioritizing patients for elective surgery - A prospective study of clinical priority assessment criteria in New Zealand [J].
Derrett, S ;
Devlin, N ;
Hansen, P ;
Herbison, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 19 (01) :91-105
[7]
Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life [J].
Derrett, S ;
Paul, C ;
Morris, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (01) :47-57
[8]
Racial disparities in joint replacement use among older adults [J].
Dunlop, DD ;
Song, J ;
Manheim, LM ;
Chang, RW .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (02) :288-298
[9]
Escalante A, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P390, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200002)43:2<390::AID-ANR20>3.0.CO
[10]
2-R