Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging

被引:85
作者
Lauenstein, Thomas C. [1 ]
Sharma, Puneet [1 ]
Hughes, Timothy [2 ]
Heberlein, Keith [2 ]
Tudorascu, Dana [1 ]
Martin, Diego R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
fat suppression; inversion recovery; abdominal MRI; retroperitoneum; bowel MRI; liver MRI;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21350
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: To test the theoretical benefits of a spectral attenuated inversion-recovery (SPAIR) fat-suppression (FS) technique in clinical abdominal MRI by comparison to conventional inversion-recovery (IR) FS combined with T2-weighted. (T2W) partial Fourier single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE). Materials and Methods: 1.5T MRI studies of the abdomen were performed in 28 patients with liver lesions (hemangiomas n = 14: metastases n = 14). T2W sequences were acquired using IR and SPAIR SSFSE. Measurements included retroperitoneal and mesenteric fat signal-to-noise (SNR) to evaluate FS; liver lesion contrast-to-noise (CNR) to evaluate bulk water signal recovery effects; and bowel wall delineation to evaluate susceptibility and physiological motion effects. Results: SPAIR-SSFSE images produce significantly improved FS and, liver lesion CNR. The mean SNR of the retroperitoneal and mesenteric fat for SPAIR ISSFSE was 20.5 +/- 10.2 ( +/- 1 SD) and 12.7 +/- 6.2, compared to 43.2 +/- 24.1 (P = 0.000006) and 29.3 +/- 16.8 (P = 0.0000005) for IR-SSFSE. SPAIR-SSFSE images produced higher CNR for both hemangiomas CNR = 164 88 vs. 126 83 (P = 0.00005) and metastases CNR = 75 27 vs. 53 19 (P = 0.007). Bowel wall visualization was significantly improved using SPAIR-SSFSE (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The theoretical benefits of SPAIR over conventional IR FS translate into significant multiple improvements that can be measured on clinical abdominal MRI scans.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1454
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients [J].
Birchard, KR ;
Brown, MA ;
Hyslop, WB ;
Firat, Z ;
Semelka, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) :452-458
[2]
Brennan Gerald D G, 2006, CJEM, V8, P425
[3]
Magnetic resonance evaluation of pregnant patients with acute abdominal pain [J].
Brown, MA ;
Birchard, KR ;
Semelka, RC .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2005, 26 (04) :206-211
[4]
Right colonic diverticulitis: MR appearance [J].
Cobben, LPJ ;
Groot, I ;
Blickman, JG ;
Puylaert, JBCM .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2003, 28 (06) :794-798
[5]
Fielding Julia R, 2006, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V17, P409, DOI 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180417d2d
[6]
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the bowel wall for assessment of disease activity in Crohn's disease [J].
Florie, J ;
Wasser, MNJM ;
Arts-Cieslik, K ;
Akkerman, EM ;
Siersema, PD ;
Stoker, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (05) :1384-1392
[7]
Liver masses: Replacement of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with breath-hold MR imaging [J].
Gaa, J ;
Hatabu, H ;
Jenkins, RL ;
Finn, JP ;
Edelman, RR .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (02) :459-464
[8]
Acute colonic diverticulitis: Visualization in magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Heverhagen, JT ;
Zielke, A ;
Ishaque, N ;
Bohrer, T ;
El-Sheik, M ;
Klose, KJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (10) :1275-1277
[9]
CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: Imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings [J].
Leite, NP ;
Pereira, JM ;
Cunha, R ;
Pinto, P ;
Sirlin, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (02) :406-417
[10]
MR imaging in patents with Crohn disease: Value of T2-versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent [J].
Maccioni, F ;
Bruni, A ;
Viscido, A ;
Colaiacomo, MC ;
Cocco, A ;
Montesani, C ;
Caprilli, R ;
Marini, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) :517-530