Reliability of Web-based teledermatology consultations

被引:46
作者
Oztas, MO
Calikoglu, E
Baz, K
Birol, A
Onder, M
Calikoglu, T
Kitapci, MT
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Tip Fak, Dept Dermatol, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Fatih Univ, Dept Dermatol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Mersin Univ, Dept Dermatol, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Kirikkale Univ, Dept Dermatol, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Ankara Oncol Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
[6] Gazi Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1258/135763304322764158
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We studied the reliability of teledermatology diagnoses made using a Web-based system. Clinical photographs and information relating to 125 patients were placed on a Web server. Three dermatologists made the most likely diagnosis via a Web interface. The reference diagnosis was made in a face-to-face consultation with a fourth dermatologist; where appropriate it was confirmed histologically. The teledermatologists were correct in 57% of cases when viewing the images alone. Their diagnostic accuracy improved to 70% when additional clinical information was available. The rate of agreement between the teledermatologists ranged from 44% to 70% (kappa =0.22-0.32). Seventy-seven per cent of the patients were correctly diagnosed by at least two dermatologists when clinical information was provided. A Web-based system appears to be reliable for teledermatology. A single well trained teledermatologist may give better results than a group of less well trained clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 28
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Lim A C, 2001, Australas J Dermatol, V42, P247, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00529.x
[2]   A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care [J].
Loane, MA ;
Bloomer, SE ;
Corbett, R ;
Eedy, DJ ;
Hicks, N ;
Lotery, HE ;
Mathews, C ;
Paisley, J ;
Steele, K ;
Wootton, R .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2000, 6 :1-3
[3]   A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study [J].
Loane, MA ;
Bloomer, SE ;
Corbett, R ;
Eedy, DJ ;
Hicks, N ;
Lotery, HE ;
Mathews, C ;
Paisley, J ;
Steele, K ;
Wootton, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 143 (06) :1241-1247
[4]   Teledermatology in New Zealand [J].
Oakley, AMM .
JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2001, 5 (02) :111-116
[5]   Teledermatology and teledermatopathology [J].
Pak, HS .
SEMINARS IN CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2002, 21 (03) :179-189
[6]   Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals [J].
Taylor, P ;
Goldsmith, P ;
Murray, K ;
Harris, D ;
Barkley, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 144 (02) :328-333
[7]   Teledermatology: Current status and future directions [J].
Whited J.D. .
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2001, 2 (2) :59-64
[8]   Teledermatology's impact on time to intervention among referrals to a dermatology consult service [J].
Whited, JD ;
Hall, RP ;
Foy, ME ;
Marbrey, LE ;
Grambow, SC ;
Dudley, TK ;
Datta, S ;
Simel, DL ;
Oddone, EZ .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2002, 8 (03) :313-321
[9]   Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations [J].
Whited, JD ;
Hall, RP ;
Simel, DL ;
Foy, ME ;
Stechuchak, KM ;
Drugge, RJ ;
Grichnik, JM ;
Myers, SA ;
Horner, RD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 41 (05) :693-702