Staffing Ratios and Quality: An Analysis of Minimum Direct Care Staffing Requirements for Nursing Homes

被引:97
作者
Bowblis, John R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Econ, Farmer Sch Business, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Scripps Gerontol Ctr, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
Minimum direct care staffing ratios; quality; nursing homes; MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT; STANDARDS; DIFFERENTIALS; PAYMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01274.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective. To study the impact of minimum direct care staffing (MDCS) requirements on nurse staffing levels, nurse skill mix, and quality. Data Sources. U.S. nursing home facility data from the Online Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) System merged with MDCS requirements. Study Design. Facility-level outcomes of nurse staffing levels, nurse skill mix, and quality measures are regressed on the level of nurse staffing required by MDCS requirements in the prior year and other controls using fixed effect panel regression. Quality measures are care practices, resident outcomes, and regulatory deficiencies. Data Extraction Method. Analysis used all OSCAR surveys from 1999 to 2004, resulting in 17,552 unique facilities with a total of 94,371 survey observations. Principle Findings. The effect of MDCS requirements varied with reliance of the nursing home on Medicaid. Higher MDCS requirements increase nurse staffing levels, while their effect on nurse skill mix depends on the reliance of the nursing home on Medicaid. MDCS have mixed effects on care practices but are generally associated with improved resident outcomes and meeting regulatory standards. Conclusions. MDCS requirements change staffing levels and skill mix, improve certain aspects of quality, but can also lead to use of care practices associated with lower quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1516
页数:22
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
DO FOR-PROFIT AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT NURSING-HOMES BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY [J].
AARONSON, WE ;
ZINN, JS ;
ROSKO, MD .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1994, 34 (06) :775-786
[2]
OWNERSHIP CONVERSION AND CLOSURE IN THE NURSING HOME INDUSTRY [J].
Bowblis, John R. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (06) :631-644
[3]
Factor substitution in nursing homes [J].
Cawley, J ;
Grabowski, DC ;
Hirth, RA .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 25 (02) :234-247
[4]
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2004, STAT OP MAN
[5]
The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes [J].
Cohen, JW ;
Spector, WD .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (01) :23-48
[6]
Cowles C.M., 2002, NURSING HOME STAT YB
[7]
Feng Zhanlian, 2005, J Am Med Dir Assoc, V6, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.008
[8]
NURSING HOME QUALITY AS A COMMON GOOD [J].
Grabowski, David C. ;
Gruber, Jonathan ;
Angelelli, Joseph J. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (04) :754-764
[9]
Medicaid nursing home payment and the role of provider taxes [J].
Grabowski, David C. ;
Feng, Zhanlian ;
Intrator, Orna ;
Mor, Vincent .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2008, 65 (04) :514-527
[10]
Medicaid payment and risk-adjusted nursing home quality measures [J].
Grabowski, DC ;
Angelelli, JJ ;
Mor, V .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2004, 23 (05) :243-252