Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions

被引:256
作者
Klein, RJT
Schipper, ELF
Dessai, S
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Oxford OX2 7DL, England
[3] Int Water Management Inst, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[4] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Univ E Anglia, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
climate policy; mitigation; adaptation; energy; impacts; vulnerability; synergies; mainstreaming; instruments;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The potential for developing synergies between climate change mitigation and adaptation has become a recent focus of both climate research and policy. Presumably the interest in synergies springs from the appeal of creating win-win situations by implementing a single climate policy option. However, institutional complexity, insufficient opportunities and uncertainty surrounding their efficiency and effectiveness present major challenges to the widespread development of synergies. There are also increasing calls for research to define the optimal mix of mitigation and adaptation. These calls are based on the misguided assumption that there is one single optimal mix of adaptation and mitigation options for all possible scenarios of climate and socio-economic change, notwithstanding uncertainty and irrespective of the diversity of values and preferences in society. In the face of current uncertainty, research is needed to provide guidance on how to develop a socially and economically justifiable mix of mitigation, adaptation and development policy, as well as on which elements would be part of such a mix. Moreover, research is needed to establish the conditions under which the process of mainstrearning can be most effective. Rather than actually developing and implementing specific mitigation and adaptation options, the objective of climate policy should be to facilitate such development and implementation as part of sectoral policies. Finally, analysis needs to focus on the optimal use and expected effectiveness of financial instruments, taking into account the mutual effects between these instruments on the one hand, and national and international sectoral investments and official development assistance on the other. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*AFDB ADB DFID EC, 2003, POV CLIM CHANG RED V
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INTEGRATED ASSESS, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1013300520580
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADAPTATION CLIMATE C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, DELTA
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENVIRONMENT
[6]  
ARROW KJ, 1996, CLIMATE CHANGE 1995, P53
[7]   Articles 4.8 and 4.9 of the UNFCCC: adverse effects and the impacts of response measures [J].
Barnett, J ;
Dessai, S .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (2-3) :231-239
[8]   Linkages between climate change and sustainable development [J].
Beg, N ;
Morlot, JC ;
Davidson, O ;
Afrane-Okesse, Y ;
Tyani, L ;
Denton, F ;
Sokona, Y ;
Thomas, JP ;
La Rovere, EL ;
Parikh, JK ;
Parikh, K ;
Rahman, AA .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (2-3) :129-144
[9]   From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy [J].
Burton, I ;
Huq, S ;
Lim, B ;
Pilifosova, O ;
Schipper, EL .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (2-3) :145-159
[10]  
Burton I., 2000, CLIMATE CHANGE DEV, P153