Public perceptions of transgenic animals

被引:30
作者
Einsiedel, EF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Commun Studies Program, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2005年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
ethics; food biotechnology; genetically modified food; perceptions of biotechnology; public opinion; transgenic animal;
D O I
10.20506/rst.24.1.1562
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The field of animal biotechnology has been rapidly expanding and the development of transgenic animals has been part of this research expansion. How the public perceives such developments is an important component of policy considerations. In general, biotechnology applications have been judged with evident hierarchies of acceptability. There appear to be hierarchies in terms of the type of organism being modified, the purpose of the application, the means to attain particular ends, and the nature of the benefits obtained. While general awareness of biotechnology and its specific applications remains low to moderate, this article presents data regarding public acceptance of a variety of applications. These range from the use of animals as disease models and as sources for tissues and organs, to the use of transgenic animals for disease control, for food, and for the production of pharmaceutical and industrial products. Case-by-case judgments are evident, but at the same time, the application of criteria such as the nature of the organism being modified, the animal welfare aspects and the ethical-moral concerns are additional criteria for public judgments. These findings are discussed in the context of their implications for public policy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
*AEBC, 2002, AN BIOT REP AEBC LON
[2]  
ALDRICH L, 1998, AGR INFORMATION B, V747
[3]  
[Anonymous], REPORT CONSUMER FOCU
[4]  
*BOYD GROUP, 1999, GEN ENG AN WELF ETH
[5]  
Bud Robert, 1993, The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology
[6]  
*CAN COUNC AN CAR, 1997, TRANSG AN AN WELF ET
[7]  
*CAN PUBL HLTH ASS, 2001, AN TO HUM TRANSPL SH
[8]  
*CEPA, 2001, GUID NOT TEST NEW SU
[9]  
Collier R., 2000, AgBioForum, V3, P156
[10]  
*DEC RES, 2004, PUBL OP RES BIOT ISS