Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium can be safely administered in maintenance renal transplant patients: Results of a 1-year study

被引:231
作者
Budde, K [1 ]
Curtis, J
Knoll, G
Chan, L
Neumayer, HH
Seifu, Y
Hall, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Charite, Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[5] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
EC-MPS; efficacy; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; immunosuppression; MMF; MPA; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; myfortic (R); renal transplant;
D O I
10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00321.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
With the objective of enhancing upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic(R), Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) has been developed. This double-blinded, 12-month study investigated whether renal transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be safely converted to EC-MPS. Stable kidney transplant patients were randomized to receive EC-MPS (720 mg b. i. d.; n = 159) or continue receiving MMF (1000 mg b. i. d.; n = = 163). The incidence of GI adverse events (AEs) was similar at 3 months (primary endpoint: EC-MPS 26.4%; MMF 20.9%; p = NS) and at 12 months (EC-MPS 29.6%; MMF 24.5%; p = NS). The increase from baseline in mean GI AE severity score, adjusted for duration, tended to be lower in EC-MPS patients (3 months: 0.15 vs. 0.20; 12 months: 0.23 vs. 0.47; p = NS). Neutropenia ( < 1500 cells/mm(3)) within the first 3 months (coprimary endpoint) was low in both groups(EC-MPS 0.6%; MMF 3.1%; p = NS). Although the overall incidence of infections was similar, the number of serious infections was significantly lower in EC-MPS patients (8.8% vs. 16.0%; p < 0.05). Similar rates of efficacy failure (EC-MPS 2.5%; MMF 6.1%; p = NS), biopsy-proven acute rejection (EC-MPS 1.3%; MMF 3.1%; p = NS) and biopsy-proven chronic rejection (EC-MPS 3.8%; MMF 4.9%; p = NS) were observed in both groups. In conclusion, renal maintenance patients can be converted from MMF to EC-MPS without compromising the safety and efficacy profile associated with MMF.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Enteric coating of mycophenolate sodium: A rational approach to limit topical gastrointestinal lesions and extend the therapeutic index of mycophenolate [J].
Bjarnason, I .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3238-3240
[2]
BUDDE K, 2002, AM J TRANSPLANT, V2, P399
[3]
Cherikh WS, 2002, AM J TRANSPLANT, V2, P468
[4]
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[5]
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[6]
A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients [J].
Kobashigawa, J ;
Miller, L ;
Renlund, D ;
Mentzer, R ;
Alderman, E ;
Bourge, R ;
Costanzo, M ;
Eisen, H ;
Dureau, G ;
Ratkovec, R ;
Hummel, M ;
Ipe, D ;
Johnson, J ;
Keogh, A ;
Mamelok, R ;
Mancini, D ;
Smart, F ;
Valantine, H .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (04) :507-515
[7]
Meier-Kriesche HU, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P2366, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V11122366
[8]
Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection [J].
Ojo, AO ;
Meier-Kriesche, HU ;
Hanson, JA ;
Leichtman, AB ;
Cibrik, D ;
Magee, JC ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Agodoa, LY ;
Kaplan, B .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (11) :2405-2409
[9]
Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients [J].
Salvadori, M ;
Holzer, H ;
de Mattos, A ;
Sollinger, H ;
Arns, W ;
Oppenheimer, F ;
Maca, J ;
Hall, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (02) :231-236
[10]
MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS [J].
SOLLINGER, HW .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (03) :225-232