Association between diabetes patients' knowledge about medications and their blood glucose control

被引:85
作者
McPherson, Mary Lynn [1 ]
Smith, Sheila Weiss [1 ]
Powers, Atsuko [2 ]
Zuckerman, Ilene H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Amherst, NH 03031 USA
关键词
diabetes mellitus; glycemic control; glycosylated hemoglobin; knowledge;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.01.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic disorder frequently resulting in hyperglycemia and numerous long-term complications. Research has shown that improved glycemic control reduces the rate and number of diabetes-related complications. Evidence suggests that patients who are more knowledgeable about diabetes self-care may be more likely to achieve better glycemic control. Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between patients' knowledge about their diabetes medications and their blood glucose control. Methods: Patients receiving oral pharmacologic treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus were asked to answer a short questionnaire assessing their knowledge about their medications. Patients were part of an ambulatory care practice in Baltimore, Maryland, that provides primary care medical services to an inner-city, predominantly African American population. A medication knowledge score (number of correct responses to 8 components) was tabulated and correlated to the most recent glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) (drawn within the previous 90 days). Multivariate models were constructed, with A1c as the outcome and patients' medication knowledge as the independent variable. Potential confounders included in the models were age, sex, education level, number of diabetes medications, and insurance status. Results: Fifty patients were screened for the study; 44 agreed to participate and met inclusion criteria. Patients' diabetes medication knowledge scores ranged between 1 and 7, with a median score of 5. Older patients (65 years and older) and male patients scored lower than their counterparts. There was a strong inverse association between knowledge score and A1c (r = -0.61; P < .001). Glycosylated hemoglobin was one-half unit lower with each one-unit increase in knowledge score among men; among women A1c was 1.6 units lower for each one-unit increase in knowledge score. Conclusion: Patients with greater understanding and knowledge of their diabetes medications demonstrated better glycemic control. This cross-sectional association of medication knowledge and A1c was more pronounced in women than in men. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] *AG HLTH CAR POL R, 1996, PRESCR MED YOU
  • [2] *AM DIAB ASS, 2007, DIABETES CARE S1, V30, pS43
  • [3] *AM DIAB ASS, AM DIAB ASS HOM PAG
  • [4] American Diabetes Association, 2002, Diabetes Care, V25, ps28
  • [5] ANDERSON BJ, 1996, PRACTICAL PSYCHOL DI, P163
  • [6] RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DIABETIC PATIENT EDUCATION - IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT IMPROVED METABOLIC STATUS
    BLOOMGARDEN, ZT
    KARMALLY, W
    METZGER, MJ
    BROTHERS, M
    NECHEMIAS, C
    BOOKMAN, J
    FAIERMAN, D
    GINSBERGFELLNER, F
    RAYFIELD, E
    BROWN, WV
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [7] Putting diabetes to the test - Analyzing glycemic control based on patients' diabetes knowledge
    Colleran, KM
    Starr, B
    Burge, MR
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (07) : 2220 - 2221
  • [8] Cranor Carole W, 2003, J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash), V43, P149, DOI 10.1331/108658003321480696
  • [9] The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control
    Gilmer, TP
    OConnor, PJ
    Manning, WG
    Rush, WA
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (12) : 1847 - 1853
  • [10] National standards for diabetes self-management education
    Mensing, C
    Boucher, J
    Cypress, M
    Weinger, K
    Mulcahy, K
    Barta, P
    Hosey, G
    Kopher, W
    Lasichak, A
    Lamb, B
    Mangan, M
    Norman, J
    Tanja, J
    Yauk, L
    Wisdom, K
    Adams, C
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (05) : 682 - 689