The beauty of asymmetry: asymmetric divisions and self-renewal in the haematopoietic system

被引:45
作者
Ho, Anthony D.
Wagner, Wolfgang
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Med 5, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Physiol & Pathophysiol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
asymmetric cell division; differentiation; haematopoietic stem cell; microenvironment; self-renewal; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; PROGENITOR CELLS; BONE-MARROW; DISPARATE DIFFERENTIATION; MULTIPOTENT PROGENITORS; LINEAGE COMMITMENT; STROMAL CELLS; CD34(+) CELLS; DROSOPHILA; NUMB;
D O I
10.1097/MOH.0b013e3281900f12
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Purpose of review The hallmark of stem cells is their dual abilities to self-renew and to differentiate into multiple lineages. To fulfill these functions they must undergo asymmetric division. A central question in developmental biology is how can a single cell divide to produce two progeny cells that adopt different fates? We provided evidence of the significance of asymmetric division in human haematopoietic stem cells. Recent findings By monitoring the symmetry of divisions of haematopoietic stem cells and following their subsequent developmental potentials at the single cell level, we established a relationship between divisional kinetics and self-renewal capacity. Direct cell-cell contact with cellular determinants in the niche has been shown to play an essential role in maintaining sternness. The creation of in-vitro models for the niche, such as human mesenchymal stromal cells, has provided a controlled laboratory environment in which the relative significance of chemokines and adhesion molecules can be studied. Summary Identification of the molecular interactions between stem cells and their niche has led to an understanding of the mechanisms that control the self-renewal of stem cells. Ultimately, molecular signals triggered by adhesion and junction complexes are responsible for the adoption of specific cell fate.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 336
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]
Asymmetric cell division: Plane but not simple [J].
Adler, PN ;
Taylor, J .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (06) :R233-R236
[2]
CSL-independent Notch signalling: a checkpoint in cell fate decisions during development? [J].
Arias, AM ;
Zecchini, V ;
Brennan, K .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 12 (05) :524-533
[3]
Rapid mobilization of murine and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist [J].
Broxmeyer, HE ;
Orschell, CM ;
Clapp, DW ;
Hangoc, G ;
Cooper, S ;
Plett, PA ;
Liles, WC ;
Li, XX ;
Graham-Evans, B ;
Campbell, TB ;
Calandra, G ;
Bridger, G ;
Dale, DC ;
Srour, EF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2005, 201 (08) :1307-1318
[4]
Asymmetric cell divisions sustain long-term hematopoiesis from single-sorted human fetal liver cells [J].
Brummendorf, TH ;
Dragowska, W ;
Zijlmans, JMJM ;
Thornbury, G ;
Lansdorp, PM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 188 (06) :1117-1124
[5]
Asymmetric segregation of Numb:: a mechanism for neural specification from Drosophila to mammals [J].
Cayouette, M ;
Raff, M .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 5 (12) :1265-1269
[6]
Cell division: Why daughters cannot be like their mothers [J].
Chang, F ;
Drubin, DG .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (06) :651-654
[7]
Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence maintained by p21cip1/waf1 [J].
Cheng, T ;
Rodrigues, N ;
Shen, HM ;
Yang, YG ;
Dombkowski, D ;
Sykes, M ;
Scadden, DT .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5459) :1804-1808
[8]
CLEAVAGE ORIENTATION AND THE ASYMMETRIC INHERITANCE OF NOTCH1 IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN MAMMALIAN NEUROGENESIS [J].
CHENN, A ;
MCCONNELL, SK .
CELL, 1995, 82 (04) :631-641
[9]
Chemokine receptor CXCR4-dependent internalization and resecretion of functional chemokine SDF-1 by bone marrow endothelial and stromal cells [J].
Dar, A ;
Goichberg, P ;
Shinder, V ;
Kalinkovich, A ;
Kollet, O ;
Netzer, N ;
Margalit, R ;
Zsak, M ;
Nagler, A ;
Hardan, I ;
Resnick, I ;
Rot, A ;
Lapidot, T .
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 6 (10) :1038-1046
[10]
CONDITIONS CONTROLLING PROLIFERATION OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELLS INVITRO [J].
DEXTER, TM ;
ALLEN, TD ;
LAJTHA, LG .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 91 (03) :335-344