Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant?

被引:55
作者
Bednekoff, PA [1 ]
Lima, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Michigan Univ, Dept Biol, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies showed that dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis, gain only partial information when their flockmates detect threats, and that they can detect threats peripherally even when they are feeding intensely. Here, we tested how this 'peripheral (head-down) vigilance' interacts with overt (head-up) vigilance and the collective detection of threats. Low barriers were used to prevent juncos from seeing to the side while pecking for food on the ground; a bird with its head raised could easily see over the barriers. Juncos and other ground-feeding birds preferred to feed without the barriers. When the barriers were present, birds generally took longer scans but spent similar periods between scans. Also, scanning patterns were less variable when the barriers were present. Following the threat-induced departure of a single bird, nondetectors were more likely to initiate scans when feeding among barriers. Barriers prevented feeding juncos from. seeing the early stages of threat-induced departures of flockmates and thus impeded the collective detection of attack. The results suggest that juncos value peripheral vigilance and that scanning patterns are affected by interactions between peripheral vigilance and overt scanning behaviour. (c) 2005 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1171
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Allee WC, 1938, The social life of animals
[2]   The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds [J].
Beauchamp, G .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 73 (04) :449-472
[3]   Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (07) :284-287
[4]   Why are scanning patterns so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti-predator vigilance [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2002, 33 (02) :143-149
[5]  
Bertram B.C.R., 1978, P64
[6]   A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager [J].
Cowlishaw, G ;
Lawes, MJ ;
Lightbody, M ;
Martin, A ;
Pettifor, R ;
Rowcliffe, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 271 (1534) :27-33
[7]   Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators [J].
Cresswell, W ;
Quinn, JL ;
Whittingham, MJ ;
Butler, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1519) :1069-1076
[8]   Evidence for a rule governing the avoidance of superfluous escape flights [J].
Cresswell, W ;
Hilton, GM ;
Ruxton, GD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1444) :733-737
[10]   The influence of visual obstructions on the vigilance and escape behaviour of house sparrows, Passer domesticus [J].
Harkin, EL ;
van Dongen, WFD ;
Herberstein, ME ;
Elgar, MA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2000, 48 (03) :259-263