Treatment of genital prolapse by hammock using porcine skin collagen implant (Pelvicol)

被引:28
作者
David-Montefiore, E [1 ]
Barranger, E [1 ]
Dubernard, G [1 ]
Detchev, R [1 ]
Nizard, V [1 ]
Daraï, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Antoine, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Hop Tenon, Serv Gynecol Obstet & Med Reprod, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.091
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Introduction. To assess the feasibility and efficacy of the hammock using a porcine skin collagen (Pelvicol) implant for the treatment of genital prolapse by the vaginal route. A total of 47 women with Stage III or IV genital prolapse underwent surgical treatment with porcine skin collagen implantation using anterior transobturator and posterior bilateral sacrospinous fixations. Genital prolapse treatment was combined with hysterectomy in 34 patients (72%). Technical Considerations. Porcine skin collagen implantation was feasible in every case. The surgical procedure lasted a median of 90 minutes (range 80 to 150). No vessel injuries, one bladder injury, and one rectal injury not requiring additional surgery occurred. One pararectal hematoma required a second procedure. The median follow-up was 24.6 +/- 8.5 months (range 6 to 42). No rejection of the porcine grafts occurred. Of the 47 women, 39 (83%) had optimal anatomic results, 5 had asymptomatic Stage I prolapse, and 2 had Stage 11 prolapse. The subjective cure rate was 93.6% (44 of 47 patients). The postoperative scores for lifestyle and urinary discomfort improved significantly after the procedure (P <0.0001 and P <0.0002, respectively). Of the 18 patients who were sexually active, an improvement in sexual discomfort occurred (P = 0.04). Conclusions. These short-term results suggest that hammock using porcine skin collagen implantation by the transobturator route and bilateral sacrospinous fixation is a safe and effective treatment for genital prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:1314 / 1318
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Pelvicol™ pubovaginal sling versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence:: A prospective randomized three-year follow-up study [J].
Abdel-Fattah, M ;
Barrington, JW ;
Arunkalaivanan, AS .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (05) :629-635
[2]
Randomized trial of porcine dermal sling (Pelvicol™ implant) vs. Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) in the Surgical treatment of stress incontinence:: a questionnaire-based study [J].
Arunkalaivanan, AS ;
Barrington, JW .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2003, 14 (01) :17-23
[3]
Barrington J W, 2004, J Obstet Gynaecol, V24, P542
[4]
Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].
Benson, JT ;
Lucente, V ;
McClellan, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421
[5]
The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[6]
Genital prolapse: vaginal versus abdominal route of repair [J].
Carey, MP ;
Dwyer, PL .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 13 (05) :499-505
[7]
Transvaginal culdosuspension: Technique and results [J].
Comiter, CV ;
Vasavada, SP ;
Raz, S .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (05) :819-822
[8]
Treatment results using pubovaginal slings in patients with large cystoceles and stress incontinence [J].
Cross, CA ;
Cespedes, RD ;
McGuire, EJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) :431-434
[9]
Sacro-spinous ligament fixation peri-operative complications in 195 cases: visual approach versus digital approach of the sacro-spinous ligament [J].
David-Montefiore, E ;
Garbin, O ;
Hummel, M ;
Nisand, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 116 (01) :71-78
[10]
Novel surgical technique for the gtreatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Transobturator vaginal tape inside-out [J].
de Leval, J .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (06) :724-730