Pharmacist proactive medication recommendations using electronic documentation in a UK general critical care unit

被引:15
作者
Bourne, Richard S. [1 ,2 ]
Choo, Chui Lynn [3 ]
机构
[1] No Gen Hosp, Dept Pharm, Sheffield Teaching Hosp, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] No Gen Hosp, Dept Crit Care, Sheffield Teaching Hosp, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[3] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Pharm, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
关键词
Clinical pharmacist; Critical care; Drug therapy; Medicines reconciliation; United Kingdom; CLINICAL PHARMACIST; HOSPITAL PHARMACIST; INTERVENTIONS; OUTCOMES; IMPROVE; ERRORS; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-012-9613-7
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Specific data on the actual clinical practice of United Kingdom pharmacists in Critical Care are limited. Within the general critical care units of Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, clinical pharmacists have the facility to electronically document, communicate and follow-up proactive recommendations using a Pharmacy Review Form via the Clinical Information System, Meta-Vision (R). Objective The objective of the service evaluation was to describe the acceptance rate by medical staff of pharmacist proactive medication recommendations; including data on the types of recommendations and reasons thereof, for general intensive care patients of a UK teaching hospital trust. Setting Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust with 20 intensive care beds located on two hospital sites admitting Level 3 and 2 mixed general medical, surgical, trauma, burns and haematology/ oncology patients. Method Retrospective analysis of pharmacist proactive recommendations recorded electronically from January 2009 to July 2011 in general intensive care unit patients. Main outcome 5,623 electronic medication recommendations were documented, providing an average of 2.2 proactive recommendations per patient admitted to intensive care from January 2009 to July 2011. 5,101 (90.7%) of the recommendations were accepted and acted upon by medical staff. Results The most common recommendations were Add Drug 1,862 (28.2%); Dose Review 1,707 (25.8%); Discontinue Drug 1,185 (17.9%); Alternative Drug 903 (13.7%); Alternative Route 770 (11.7%). The most common reasons for the proactive medication recommendations were related to changes in gastrointestinal absorption 951 (15.6%); compliance with medication guidelines 857 (14.1%); sedation/delirium/agitation management 764 (12.6%); dose adjustment for renal dysfunction or continuous renal replacement therapies 756 (12.4%); and medication reconciliation 612 (10.1%). The majority of medication recommendations involved drugs in Gastrointestinal, Central Nervous System, Cardiovascular, Infection, Nutrition and Blood classes (British National Formulary). Conclusion There was a high acceptance rate for proactive medication-related recommendations made by critical care pharmacists via the electronic review form. The majority of pharmacist recommendations were related to adding or refining currently prescribed medication. Ten percent of recommendations related to medication reconciliation of patients' pre-admission medication.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Al-Jazairi AS, 2008, SAUDI MED J, V29, P277
[2]   IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study [J].
Ammenwerth E. ;
Iller C. ;
Mahler C. .
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6 (1) :13P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TECHN PAT SAF SOL ME
[4]   Predicting the rate of physician-accepted interventions by hospital pharmacists in the United Kingdom [J].
Barber, ND ;
Batty, R ;
Ridout, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997, 54 (04) :397-405
[5]   Clinical pharmacist interventions on a UK neurosurgical critical care unit: a 2-week service evaluation [J].
Bourne, Richard S. ;
Dorward, Ben J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2011, 33 (05) :755-758
[6]   PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS IMPROVE FLUID BALANCE IN FLUID-RESTRICTED PATIENTS REQUIRING PARENTERAL-NUTRITION [J].
BROYLES, JE ;
BROWN, RO ;
VEHE, KL ;
NOLLY, RJ ;
LUTHER, RW .
DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1991, 25 (02) :119-122
[7]  
Choo CL, 2009, THESIS U LEEDS LEEDS
[8]  
Churchwell MD, 2009, SEMINARS DIALYSIS, P185
[9]   Reversing oversedation in the intensive care unit: The role of pharmacists in energizing guideline efforts and overcoming protocol fatigue [J].
Devlin, John W. ;
Nasraway, Stanley A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (02) :626-628
[10]   The effect of ICU sedation guidelines and pharmacist interventions on clinical outcomes and drug cost [J].
Devlin, JW ;
Holbrook, AM ;
Fuller, HD .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1997, 31 (06) :689-695