Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU

被引:132
作者
Ahlers, Sabine J. G. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Gulik, Laura [1 ]
van der Veen, Aletta M. [1 ]
van Dongen, Hendricus P. A. [1 ]
Bruins, Peter [1 ]
Belitser, Svetlana V. [4 ]
de Boer, Anthonius [4 ]
Tibboel, Dick [3 ]
Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Sophia Childrens Univ Hosp, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Pediat Surg, NL-3015 GJ Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacotherapy, NL-3584 CA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2008年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/cc6789
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
Background Pain in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit ( ICU) is common. However, pain assessment in critically ill patients often is complicated because these patients are unable to communicate effectively. Therefore, we designed a study ( a) to determine the inter- rater reliability of the Numerical Rating Scale ( NRS) and the Behavioral Pain Scale ( BPS), ( b) to compare pain scores of different observers and the patient, and ( c) to compare NRS, BPS, and the Visual Analog Scale ( VAS) for measuring pain in patients in the ICU. Methods We performed a prospective observational study in 113 non- paralyzed critically ill patients. The attending nurses, two researchers, and the patient ( when possible) obtained 371 independent observation series of NRS, BPS, and VAS. Data analyses were performed on the sample size of patients ( n = 113). Results Inter- rater reliability of the NRS and BPS proved to be adequate ( kappa = 0.71 and 0.67, respectively). The level of agreement within one scale point between NRS rated by the patient and NRS scored by attending nurses was 73%. However, high patient scores ( NRS = 4) were underestimated by nurses ( patients 33% versus nurses 18%). In responsive patients, a high correlation between NRS and VAS was found ( r(s) = 0.84, P < 0.001). In ventilated patients, a moderate positive correlation was found between the NRS and the BPS ( r(s) = 0.55, P < 0.001). However, whereas 6% of the observations were NRS of greater than or equal to 4, BPS scores were all very low ( median 3.0, range 3.0 to 5.0). Conclusion The different scales show a high reliability, but observer- based evaluation often underestimates the pain, particularly in the case of high NRS values (= 4) rated by the patient. Therefore, whenever this is possible, ICU patients should rate their pain. In unresponsive patients, primarily the attending nurse involved in daily care should score the patient's pain. In ventilated patients, the BPS should be used only in conjunction with the NRS nurse to measure pain levels in the absence of painful stimuli.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients [J].
Aïssaoui, Y ;
Zeggwagh, AA ;
Zekraoui, A ;
Abidi, K ;
Abouqal, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05) :1470-1476
[2]
Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in an ED [J].
Berthier, F ;
Potel, G ;
Leconte, P ;
Touze, MD ;
Baron, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (02) :132-136
[3]
Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation [J].
Brook, AD ;
Ahrens, TS ;
Schaiff, R ;
Prentice, D ;
Sherman, G ;
Shannon, W ;
Kollef, MH .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) :2609-2615
[4]
Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit [J].
Chanques, G ;
Jaber, S ;
Barbotte, E ;
Violet, S ;
Sebbane, M ;
Perrigault, PF ;
Mann, C ;
Lefrant, JY ;
Eledjam, JJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (06) :1691-1699
[5]
The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97
[6]
Dimopoulou Ioanna, 2005, Eur J Intern Med, V16, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2004.10.015
[7]
Fleiss JL., 2003, STAT METHODS RATES P, P598, DOI 10.1002/0471445428
[8]
Evaluation of pain in the critically ill patient [J].
Hamill-Ruth, RJ ;
Marohn, ML .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1999, 15 (01) :35-+
[9]
HUSKISSON EC, 1974, LANCET, V2, P1127, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8
[10]
THE MEASUREMENT OF CLINICAL PAIN INTENSITY - A COMPARISON OF 6 METHODS [J].
JENSEN, MP ;
KAROLY, P ;
BRAVER, S .
PAIN, 1986, 27 (01) :117-126