DNA biosensor for rapid detection of genotoxic compounds in soil samples

被引:14
作者
Bagni, G
Hernandez, S
Mascini, M
Sturchio, E
Boccia, P
Marconi, S
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Chem, I-50019 Florence, Italy
[2] Natl Univ Littoral, Dept Chem, RA-3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
[3] Natl Author Hlth & Safety Work ISPESL, Dept Ind Installat & Interact Environm DIPIA, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[4] Natl Inst Soil Def ISSDS, I-02100 Rieti, Italy
关键词
DNA damage; electrochemical DNA biosensors; genotoxicity; soil contamination;
D O I
10.3390/s5060394
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An electrochemical DNA-based biosensor is proposed as a fast and easy screening method for the detection of genotoxic compounds in soil samples. The biosensor was assembled by immobilising double stranded Calf thymus DNA on screen-printed electrodes. The interactions between DNA and environmental pollutants can cause variations of the electrochemical proprieties of DNA when they cause a DNA damage. Preliminary studies were performed using benzene, naphthalene and anthracene derivatives as model compounds. The effect of these compounds on the surface-confined DNA was found to be linearly related to their concentration in solution. On the other hand, the objective was to optimise the ultrasonic extraction conditions of these compounds from artificially spiked soil samples. Then, the applicability of such a biosensor was evaluated by analysing soil samples from an Italian region with ecological risk (ACNA of Cengio, SV). DNA biosensor for qualitative analysis of soil presented a good correlation with a semi-quantitative method for aromatic ring systems determination as fixed wavelength fluorescence and interestingly, according results were found also with other bioassays. This kind of biosensors represent a new, easy and fast way of analysis of polluted sites, therefore they can be used as early warnings devices in areas with ecological risk as in situ measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 410
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, P 2000 C HAZ WAST RE
[2]  
AVIDANO L, 2005, IN PRESS APPL SOIL E
[3]   Comparison of different drying, extraction and detection techniques for the determination of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in background contaminated soil samples [J].
Berset, JD ;
Ejem, M ;
Holzer, R ;
Lischer, P .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 383 (03) :263-275
[4]   Electrochemical DNA biosensor for environmental monitoring [J].
Chiti, G ;
Marrazza, G ;
Mascini, M .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2001, 427 (02) :155-164
[5]   Soil remediation: humic acids as natural surfactants in the washings of highly contaminated soils [J].
Conte, P ;
Agretto, A ;
Spaccini, R ;
Piccolo, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2005, 135 (03) :515-522
[6]   Investigation of naphtalene sulfonate compounds sorption in a soil artificially contaminated using batch and column assays [J].
Esposito, A ;
Del Borghi, A ;
Vegliò, F .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (08) :937-943
[7]   Optimized extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil samples [J].
Gfrerer, M ;
Serschen, M ;
Lankmayr, E .
JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL METHODS, 2002, 53 (1-3) :203-216
[8]   The extraction of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) residues from a clay soil using sonication and a Soxhlet procedure: a comparative study [J].
Guerin, TF .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 1999, 1 (01) :63-67
[9]   Comparisons of Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix [J].
Hawthorne, SB ;
Grabanski, CB ;
Martin, E ;
Miller, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 892 (1-2) :421-433
[10]  
LANGDON CJ, 2003, ENVIRON POLLUT, V24, P361