Double-blind, Randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT

被引:397
作者
Chia, Stephen [1 ]
Gradishar, William
Mauriac, Louis
Bines, Jose
Amant, Frederic
Federico, Miriam
Fein, Luis
Romieu, Gilles
Buzdar, Aman
Robertson, John F. R.
Brufsky, Adam
Possinger, Kurt
Rennie, Pamela
Sapunar, Francisco
Lowe, Elizabeth
Piccart, Martine
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, British Columbia Canc Agcy, Div Med Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5822
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose The third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used as adjuvant and first-line advanced therapy for postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Because many patients subsequently experience progression or relapse, it is important to identify agents with efficacy after AI failure. Materials and Methods Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial (EFECT) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter phase III trial of fulvestrant versus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR + advanced breast cancer (ABC) progressing or recurring after nonsteroidal AI. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A fulvestrant loading-dose (LD) regimen was used: 500 mg intramuscularly on day 0, 250 mg on days 14, 28, and 250 mg every 28 days thereafter. Exemestane 25 mg orally was administered once daily. Results A total of 693 women were randomly assigned to fulvestrant (n = 351) or exemestane ( n = 342). Approximately 60% of patients had received at least two prior endocrine therapies. Median TTP was 3.7 months in both groups ( hazard ratio = 0.963; 95% CI, 0.819 to 1.133; P = .6531). The overall response rate ( 7.4% v 6.7%; P = .736) and clinical benefit rate ( 32.2% v 31.5%; P = .853) were similar between fulvestrant and exemestane respectively. Median duration of clinical benefit was 9.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events or quality of life. Pharmacokinetic data confirm that steady-state was reached within 1 month with the LD schedule of fulvestrant. Conclusion Fulvestrant LD and exemestane are equally active and well-tolerated in a meaningful proportion of postmenopausal women with ABC who have experienced progression or recurrence during treatment with a nonsteroidal AI.
引用
收藏
页码:1664 / 1670
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Bonneterre J, 2001, CANCER, V92, P2247, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20011101)92:9<2247::AID-CNCR1570>3.0.CO
[2]
2-Y
[3]
A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer [J].
Coombes, RC ;
Hall, E ;
Gibson, LJ ;
Paridaens, R ;
Jassem, J ;
Delozier, T ;
Jones, SE ;
Alvarez, I ;
Bertelli, G ;
Ortmann, O ;
Coates, AS ;
Bajetta, E ;
Dodwell, D ;
Coleman, RE ;
Fallowfield, LJ ;
Mickiewicz, E ;
Andersen, J ;
Lonning, PE ;
Cocconi, G ;
Stewart, A ;
Stuart, N ;
Snowdon, CF ;
Carpentieri, M ;
Massimini, G ;
Bliss, JM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (11) :1081-1092
[4]
DAUVOIS S, 1993, J CELL SCI, V106, P1377
[5]
ANTIESTROGEN ICI-164,384 REDUCES CELLULAR ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR CONTENT BY INCREASING ITS TURNOVER [J].
DAUVOIS, S ;
DANIELIAN, PS ;
WHITE, R ;
PARKER, MG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (09) :4037-4041
[6]
DEFRIEND DJ, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P408
[7]
Patients' preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Atkins, L ;
Catt, S ;
Cox, A ;
Coxon, C ;
Langridge, C ;
Morris, R ;
Price, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) :205-210
[8]
INHIBITION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR DNA-BINDING BY THE PURE ANTIESTROGEN ICI-164,384 APPEARS TO BE MEDIATED BY IMPAIRED RECEPTOR DIMERIZATION [J].
FAWELL, SE ;
WHITE, R ;
HOARE, S ;
SYDENHAM, M ;
PAGE, M ;
PARKER, MG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (17) :6883-6887
[9]
Response to fulvestrant in heavily pretreated postmenopausal women: a single-center experience [J].
Franco, S ;
Perez, A ;
Tan-Chiu, E ;
Frankel, C ;
Vogel, CL .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 (02) :103-108
[10]
Geisler J, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P2089