Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach

被引:67
作者
Bussmann, JBJ [1 ]
Stam, HJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Rehabil, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1191/026921598674267844
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Mobility is an important construct in rehabilitation; many instruments have emerged which measure or assess (aspects of) mobility. In the selection or development of an appropriate technique, knowledge about the fundamentals of rehabilitation medicine is needed, as well as about essential characteristics of techniques and fundamental differences between them. The aim of this paper is to classify, assess and discuss current techniques which are or can be used to measure aspects of mobility. Design: Eight techniques (physical science techniques, clinimetry, observation, diaries, questionnaires, actigraphy, physiological techniques and activity monitors) are classified, assessed and discussed, based on the level of outcome measures, the aspect of mobility they measure, and methodological and practical criteria. Results and conclusions: Rehabilitation medicine has a particular need for instruments that enable measurement of outcome measures on the level of activity and role fulfilment. Techniques differ in the type and number of mobility aspects they measure. Furthermore, important differences exist based on methodological and practical criteria. One optimal technique does not exist: the choice of a technique always depends on a complexity of factors, such as clinical problem, research questions, the mobility aspect of interest, required methodological strength, costs and availability.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 464
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A SIMPLE ACTIVITY MEASURE FOR USE WITH AMBULATORY SUBJECTS [J].
ANASTASIADES, P ;
JOHNSTON, DW .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 27 (01) :87-93
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[3]   Total free living energy expenditure in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Baarends, EM ;
Schols, AMWJ ;
Pannemans, DLE ;
Westerterp, KR ;
Wouters, EFM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 155 (02) :549-554
[4]  
Badley E M, 1993, Disabil Rehabil, V15, P161
[5]  
BENNEKOM CAM, 1995, THESIS VRIJE U AMSTE
[6]   STANDING BALANCE AND FUNCTION OVER THE COURSE OF ACUTE REHABILITATION [J].
BOHANNON, RW ;
LEARY, KM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (11) :994-996
[7]  
BOUCHARD TJ, 1976, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL, P364
[8]  
BOUTEN CVC, 1995, THESIS TU EINDHOVEN
[9]   COMMENT ON CRITERIA FOR PATIENT-EVALUATION TOOLS [J].
BRAND, RA ;
CROWNINSHIELD, RD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1981, 14 (09) :655-655
[10]  
BRANDSMA JW, 1995, J REHABILITATION SCI, V8, P2