Effect of interaural level and phase cues on intervening interference in auditory working memory for loudness

被引:7
作者
Jump, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Ries, Dennis T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Sch Hearing Speech & Language Sci, Auditory Percept Lab, Grover Ctr W241, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
intensity; loudness; just noticeable difference; auditory working memory;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 [病理学与病理生理学]; 100213 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
摘要
The focus of this study was to gauge the influence of intervening interference on an intensity standard held within auditory working memory through measurement of the just noticeable difference (JND) for intensity. Additionally, the use of interaural phase differences and interaural level differences as spatial cues were employed to identify whether these indicators provided a means for release from interference. A series of tones, both with and without spatial cues, were presented to subjects and responses were obtained using the method of constant stimuli. The JND for intensity was measured in a control condition with a silent inter-comparison interval and three conditions containing intervening tones within the temporal gap between the standard and comparison stimuli. The presence of intervening interference produced a significant increase in the intensity difference needed for discrimination. Further, the provision of spatial cues did not result in a significant release from this interference. These results indicate that a release from interference is not obtained when listeners are required to rely entirely on information used for spatial location (i.e., overall intensity differences and interaural phase/intensity differences) without unique information identifying the sound source to aid in retention of relevant information within auditory working memory. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 115
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Different interference effects in musicians and a control group [J].
Berti, Stefan ;
Muenzer, Stefan ;
Schroeger, Erich ;
Pechmann, Thomas .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 53 (02) :111-116
[2]
RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR PITCH OF FIXED AND ROVING STIMULUS TONES [J].
BULL, AR ;
CUDDY, LL .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1972, 11 (1B) :105-&
[3]
Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness [J].
Clément, S ;
Demany, L ;
Semal, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (05) :2805-2811
[4]
On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes [J].
Cowan, N ;
Elliott, EM ;
Saults, JS ;
Morey, CC ;
Mattox, S ;
Hismjatullina, A ;
Conway, ARA .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 51 (01) :42-100
[5]
EFFECT OF REPETITION OF STANDARD AND COMPARISON TONES ON RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR PITCH [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 93 (01) :156-&
[6]
DISLOCATION OF TONES IN A MUSICAL SEQUENCE - A MEMORY ILLUSION [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
NATURE, 1970, 226 (5242) :286-&
[7]
GENERALITY OF INTERFERENCE BY TONAL STIMULI IN RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR PITCH [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 26 (MAY) :229-234
[8]
TONES AND NUMBERS - SPECIFICITY OF INTERFERENCE IN IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
SCIENCE, 1970, 168 (3939) :1604-&
[9]
FACILITATION BY REPETITION IN RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR TONAL PITCH [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1975, 3 (03) :263-266
[10]
INTERFERENCE IN PITCH MEMORY AS A FUNCTION OF EAR OR INPUT [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 30 (MAY) :283-287