THE DYNAMIC INTERPLAY OF CAPABILITY STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES: INVESTIGATING THE BASES OF TEMPORARY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

被引:177
作者
Sirmon, David G. [1 ]
Hitt, Michael A. [1 ]
Arregle, Jean-Luc [2 ]
Campbell, Joanna Tochman [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Edhec Business Sch, Nice, France
关键词
competitive advantage; capabilities; weakness; strength; durability; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; STRATEGIC RESOURCES; FIRM RESOURCES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; COMPLEMENTARITIES; HYPERCOMPETITION; INNOVATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1002/smj.893
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Foundational RBV work suggests that firms possess capabilities that represent strengths and others that represent weaknesses. In contrast, contemporary research has examined capability strengths while largely ignoring weaknesses. Addressing this oversight, we examine the direct and integrated effects of sets of capability strengths and capability weaknesses on competitive advantage and its empirical correlate-relative performance. Additionally, we explore how environmental and firm-specific factors influence change in these drivers of competitive advantage over time. Results suggest that weakness sets have a negative effect on relative performance, while strength sets have an increasingly positive effect. The integrative effects of strength and weakness sets affect relative performance in a complex manner. For example, while high strength/low weakness firms perform at high levels, firms integrating high strength with high weakness perform well, but experience considerably more variance in their realized outcomes. Lastly, we find that the strength and weakness sets change significantly over time in markets where competition is more intense, thereby undermining the durability of competitive advantage. Our theory and results indicate that achieving temporary advantage is more difficult than previously thought and that the erosion of advantage occurs routinely as a result of dynamic and interactive rivalry. Copyright. (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1409
页数:24
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Differences in RBV Strategic Factors and the Need to Consider Opposing Factors in Turnaround Outcomes [J].
Arend, Richard J. .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2008, 29 (04) :337-355
[2]   The definition of strategic liabilities, and their impact on firm performance [J].
Arend, RJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2004, 41 (06) :1003-1027
[3]   Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage [J].
Arend, RJ .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (03) :279-284
[4]   A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm [J].
Armstrong, Craig E. ;
Shimizu, Katsuhiko .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2007, 33 (06) :959-986
[5]  
Barnett WP, 2004, ADMIN SCI QUART, V49, P535
[6]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[7]   THE NEW COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE [J].
BETTIS, RA ;
HITT, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1995, 16 :7-19
[8]   STRATEGIC RESOURCES - TRAITS, CONFIGURATIONS AND PATHS TO SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BLACK, JA ;
BOAL, KB .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :131-148
[9]   The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance [J].
Carmeli, A ;
Tishler, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (13) :1257-1278
[10]  
Castanias RP, 2001, J MANAGE, V27, P661, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00117-9